|
|
| Re: Slant R42... (642116) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
|
| (642773) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Tue Jul 1 14:59:47 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by G1Ravage on Tue Jul 1 05:42:38 2008. Holy trespassing, that's Phil D. |
|
|
| (642777) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by Russ on Tue Jul 1 15:09:28 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 12:44:03 2008. Engineering comes naturally to meHow do you know that it comes naturally to you? That's a subjective value judgment. Do you have any credentials to render your judgment credible? Any? |
|
|
| (642870) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 1 17:14:44 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by trainsarefun on Tue Jul 1 12:42:30 2008. you are empowering this asshole by humoring him. He feeds off the attention. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (642893) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Tue Jul 1 17:32:09 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by Train Dude on Tue Jul 1 17:14:44 2008. Good point.Especially in the face of his 'credentials' for making the queerest assertions. |
|
|
| (642916) | |
Re: REEF PLEASE: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Tue Jul 1 17:57:18 2008, in response to Re: REEF PLEASE: Slant R42..., posted by BMTLines on Mon Jun 30 23:03:06 2008. Cleanup on Aisle 5, cleanup on Aisle 5, toxic spill, evacuate. |
|
|
| (642946) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 20:05:45 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by Russ on Tue Jul 1 15:09:28 2008. No, i do not have a degree, if that is what you are asking. |
|
|
| (642947) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by Russ on Tue Jul 1 20:08:38 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 20:05:45 2008. No, i do not have a degree, if that is what you are asking.No, that's not what I asked. I asked, "do you have any credentials to render your judgment credible?" |
|
|
| (642986) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 22:21:13 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by Russ on Tue Jul 1 20:08:38 2008. i know physics pretty well, and have picked up some info on railcar manufacturing, and truck and car manufacturing here and there, in the end, frame construction is most robust, and holds up best. And easier to maintain. |
|
|
| (643048) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by Gerry6309 on Tue Jul 1 23:17:02 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 12:58:42 2008. There is a difference in the principles used to construct the various types of cars. The smashed up R-38, was probably partially telescoped, at the expense of any occupant of the cab (or the adjacent public area). The more modern equipment has full width cabs, offering more protection to the public. The whole body also absorbs the blow reducing the danger to any cab occupant. New York was very slow to adopt lighter weight construction techniques, long in use elsewhere. I am not a structural engineer, but I do know the basic laws of physics. The energy of the moving object in a collision has to go somewhere. It is absorbed by the vehicle struck or transferred to it. The newer designs absorb the energy through the whole structure, the older ones do not. Ask a real engineer which is better, because I am not qualified to render an opinion on that!. |
|
|
| (643052) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 23:18:32 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by Gerry6309 on Tue Jul 1 23:17:02 2008. ok...but the older cars were more robust though, right? |
|
|
| (643063) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by Gerry6309 on Tue Jul 1 23:28:54 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 23:18:32 2008. Please read my last post! |
|
|
| (643079) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by metropod on Wed Jul 2 00:21:40 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by Gerry6309 on Tue Jul 1 23:28:54 2008. he only sees what he wants to see. |
|
|
| (643111) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by MJF on Wed Jul 2 05:22:53 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 23:18:32 2008. Did you just learn about the word robust in Special Ed today? |
|
|
| (643121) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 07:18:24 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by aem7ac on Tue Jul 1 01:40:19 2008. Another transit website |
|
|
| (643123) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 07:18:49 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Amanda on Tue Jul 1 01:38:24 2008. truth |
|
|
| (643124) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 07:19:35 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by 9 local on Mon Jun 30 22:15:44 2008. How can one be fired from a non-job? |
|
|
| (643125) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 07:21:55 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by 9 local on Mon Jun 30 22:53:01 2008. Hired? Fired? What TTMG is a salaried position now? |
|
|
| (643127) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 07:29:24 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 21:39:00 2008. you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass |
|
|
| (643130) | |
Re: ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Wed Jul 2 07:37:33 2008, in response to ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...), posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 07:29:24 2008. Is that what Red Forman told you to write on the board 100 times? |
|
|
| (643134) | |
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:07:28 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by metropod on Tue Jul 1 12:30:58 2008. 
|
|
|
| (643136) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:13:08 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by rionOne on Mon Jun 30 22:25:46 2008. Oh lord, Phildos' a mentor. That's just plain frightening. |
|
|
| (643138) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:17:01 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 22:30:18 2008. Now you are making unfounded accusations? You are one pathetic fuckhead. You even make foamers look bad. |
|
|
| (643140) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:26:29 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 22:42:04 2008. Making unfounded accusations is grounds for a defamation of chaaracter lawsuit. You stupid shit. |
|
|
| (643142) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:28:47 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by rionOne on Mon Jun 30 22:57:06 2008. Trevor you don't have to defend yourself to phildo. |
|
|
| (643143) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:31:51 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by MABSTOA Yard Dispatcher on Tue Jul 1 02:33:47 2008. Is that why I've been seeing missing builders plates on trains? Phildo is the culprit. God I hope the TA comes after his sorry ass. |
|
|
| (643144) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:32:14 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Mr Mabstoa on Tue Jul 1 03:48:05 2008. HAHA |
|
|
| (643145) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:34:45 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by 9 local on Mon Jun 30 22:32:07 2008. You can't fire some one froM non-paying position. |
|
|
| (643146) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:36:07 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by 9 local on Mon Jun 30 18:18:36 2008. you're friggen pitiful. |
|
|
| (643148) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:37:24 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 22:49:55 2008. POT=BLACK |
|
|
| (643149) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:38:25 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by 9 local on Mon Jun 30 22:53:04 2008. Is he collecting unemployment? |
|
|
| (643151) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:41:04 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 23:05:20 2008. Whoever it was they did the right thing. I would've thrown you under a train. |
|
|
| (643152) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:42:09 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by AMoreira81 on Mon Jun 30 23:06:14 2008. You are giving him waaaaaay too much credit. |
|
|
| (643153) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:42:53 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by metropod on Mon Jun 30 23:13:21 2008. No, if he had any he wouldn't of done it in the first place. |
|
|
| (643154) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:45:28 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Osmosis Jones on Tue Jul 1 01:48:15 2008. Cold? Maybe. Deserved? Most definitly. |
|
|
| (643155) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:46:18 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Pablo M 201 on Mon Jun 30 22:33:40 2008. I still don't understand how you get fired from a non-paying job. |
|
|
| (643157) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:48:52 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Pablo M 201 on Mon Jun 30 22:52:25 2008. I had a friend of mine in TA ask me about the "incident" and if I knew any of the people involved. |
|
|
| (643159) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:50:34 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by AMoreira81 on Mon Jun 30 23:00:10 2008. There's something else that's already in that outfit that he'd like to squeeze, I'll bet. |
|
|
| (643160) | |
Re: Judge Judy's Questions for Phil |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:53:39 2008, in response to Judge Judy's Questions for Phil, posted by Ken S. on Tue Jul 1 00:04:43 2008. lol |
|
|
| (643161) | |
ANOTHER PHILDO THREAD (WAS: Slant R42...) |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jul 2 08:53:53 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 21:39:00 2008. you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass.....you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass......you're a dumbass....you're a dumbass...you're a dumbass |
|
|
| (643169) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Steve B-8AVEXP on Wed Jul 2 09:17:43 2008, in response to Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 17:00:16 2008. Hey Moe, your nose is crooked!Oh yeah? So'd yours. (BOP!!!) |
|
|
| (643176) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:39:34 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 22:51:18 2008. And you tried to steal a train, dickhead! |
|
|
| (643177) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:42:59 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 22:42:04 2008. Trevor does not steal property. If he did, then he would lose the trust of many NYCT bus employees, while being barred from attending bus events.How many transit related goodies did you steal? Taking candies from babies? |
|
|
| (643179) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:45:52 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 22:56:31 2008. You can't use that outfit to break into trains. |
|
|
| (643180) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:47:29 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Phil D. on Mon Jun 30 21:39:00 2008. You camera sucks just like something else you do. Only it's balls. |
|
|
| (643185) | |
Re: Judge Judy's Questions for Phil |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:52:04 2008, in response to Re: Judge Judy's Questions for Phil, posted by G1Ravage on Tue Jul 1 05:50:31 2008. Too bad Phil did this 20 years too late, he could have gotten her as his judge and she would have sent him to jail. |
|
|
| (643186) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:52:49 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:42:59 2008. Didn't soneone get shot trying to take candy from a baby? |
|
|
| (643187) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:56:03 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:47:29 2008. Maybe that's why he likes being in jail so much. |
|
|
| (643188) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:56:06 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 09:47:29 2008. Maybe that's why he likes being in jail so much. |
|
|
| (643189) | |
Sorry about the double post |
|
|
Posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:56:40 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:56:06 2008. Server acting up again. |
|
|
| (643191) | |
Re: Slant R42... |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Plaza David on Wed Jul 2 10:00:23 2008, in response to Re: Slant R42..., posted by Ken S. on Wed Jul 2 09:52:49 2008. I was hoping so, but Phil is still posting. |
|
|
|
Page 3 of 5 |
||
