Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 3

 

(628968)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jun 5 15:56:06 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jun 3 10:49:08 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
More kooky stuff outta you, eh? What kind of meds are you on?

David Gunn would not be interested in leading a Proletarian Revolution—certainly not with his pro-business outlook (he ain't no Commie, IOW). He's been done with Amtrak since 2005. Go take your Stalin-worship somewhere else.

Post a New Response

(628970)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jun 5 15:59:31 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Jun 5 12:45:37 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Stop drinking this stuff. You'll feel and think better.



Post a New Response

(628974)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Dave on Thu Jun 5 16:12:22 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by trainsarefun on Thu Jun 5 15:42:21 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Please...don't confuse the issue with facts!

Post a New Response

(Sponsored)

iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It

(629027)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Bingham C50 on Thu Jun 5 18:26:17 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Jun 5 14:33:52 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Look, I DON"T want this thread trashed or "reefed."

Try to stay on topic, please?

Thanks.

Post a New Response

(629033)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jun 5 18:48:35 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by Bingham C50 on Thu Jun 5 18:26:17 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Don't sweat it. Unca Larry's quite adept at reefing subthreads and leaving the originals intact.

Post a New Response

(629036)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by monorail on Thu Jun 5 18:56:53 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by JohnL on Thu Jun 5 14:32:38 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
'The laws I quoted are only named after the people who discovered them.'

WHERE and HOW are laws, 'discovered'???????

Post a New Response

(629038)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jun 5 19:01:00 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by monorail on Thu Jun 5 18:56:53 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Hmm. Guess you didn't study science in school.

Post a New Response

(629200)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by monorail on Thu Jun 5 23:11:36 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jun 5 19:01:00 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
studied the science TEACHER......

Post a New Response

(629204)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Jun 5 23:18:35 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jun 5 15:44:53 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"Part of the special theory of relativity states that the speed of light is constant in all frames of reference"

Isn't that what i said he said?

Post a New Response

(629228)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Jun 5 23:36:48 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by monorail on Thu Jun 5 18:56:53 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You are right, laws are not really discovered. Most "scientists" of today and the past were perverts, though some were EXCELLENT. Like faraday, maxwell, and tesla, but a lot were perverted, and had no care for science. Oh, and By the way, Tesla was on *MY* side when it came to relativity: it is flawed, and to see the flaws is quite easy. Time dilation seems to be real, but i am sure it works differently from the way it is described. Like i said, einstein was not an idiot, but he was no god, a lot of his stuff is massively flawed, and he wasn't the one to even discover mass equivalence to energy, but that is that.

Seriously, we have to quit working on the theoretical and flawed nonsense, and start figuring out ways to pull energy out of the aethers, and grab and thrash the aether to produce interstellar propulsion not bounded by rocket physics. I need good equiptment to do good research, but right now my brain is the main tool, and will always be. I think the electrostatic phenomena is key to both problems.

Post a New Response

(629259)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 6 00:57:02 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Thu Jun 5 23:36:48 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Wow, another post where everything you say is wrong. Except the part where you say that Einstein is not God.

Post a New Response

(629260)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 6 00:57:23 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by monorail on Thu Jun 5 23:11:36 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That I believe.

Post a New Response

(629272)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Fri Jun 6 01:17:24 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 6 00:57:02 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
No, i read from multiple sources that Tesla disagreed with einstein and his relativity THEORIES. Also, Tesla also believed that it was possible to pull energy out of the aether.

Post a New Response

(629284)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photo Rights Issue Gets POLITICAL

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Fri Jun 6 02:05:53 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photo Rights Issue Gets POLITICAL, posted by SUBWAYSURF on Wed Jun 4 16:12:58 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
yes !!
yours
ROFL

Post a New Response

(629286)

view threaded

Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention

Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Jun 6 02:08:57 2008, in response to Re: Union Station Photographers Rights Issue Gets Press Attention, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Fri Jun 6 01:17:24 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
There you go sniffing aether again. That's an alchemist's term and has nothing to do with science. There is no "aether". There are only organic chemical compounds called ethers.

Tesla theorized that it may be possible to harness cosmic background radiation. Is this what you're mistaking for your "aether"?

Yes, Tesla had some criticisms of Einstein. But he was dead before he got to see Einstein's work in action (died 1943). Also, Tesla, insofar as attacking anything he perceived to be "metaphysics", showed atheistic tendencies.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3]

< Previous Page  

Page 3 of 3

 

[ Return to the Message Index ]