|
|
| Chambers-Aftermath map (43647) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (43647) | |
Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:01:17 2005 Well just let me know what you guys think :-) |
|
|
| (43657) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by American Pig on Thu Jan 27 00:10:19 2005, in response to Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:01:17 2005. Drop the square V bullet next to Second Avenue. |
|
|
| (43663) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:21:09 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by American Pig on Thu Jan 27 00:10:19 2005. I've heard some V's still terminates there. So I'm not going to take it down yet. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (43669) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by #3 West End Jeff on Thu Jan 27 00:38:52 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:21:09 2005. The "V" service on Fulton St. in Brooklyn will work for the time being. However, I also think that they can run the "C" train through the Rutgers St. tunnel.#3 West End Jeff |
|
|
| (43680) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Thu Jan 27 01:34:40 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:21:09 2005. Make smoother curves out of the V route, to keep with the flow of the map. |
|
|
| (43682) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 02:20:50 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Thu Jan 27 01:34:40 2005. Well best I can do for now. |
|
|
| (43699) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Jan 27 04:14:12 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:21:09 2005. Several routes have scheduled short-turns, but they don't get extra squares.It's quite possible -- likely, IMO -- that the service pattern will be tweaked a bit before being made semipermanent. So don't put too much effort into this just yet. |
|
|
| (43849) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Eric B on Thu Jan 27 12:24:44 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by David of Broadway on Thu Jan 27 04:14:12 2005. Those are a bit more than just short turns. The V runs an hour or two longer than the C, (forgot whether it starts earlier), so after a certain time, they start running only to 2nd Av. |
|
|
| (44081) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Thu Jan 27 23:49:07 2005, in response to Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:01:17 2005. There's no direct A service to Rock Park.Drop the D-train box in the Bronx talking about no express service till Fall 2004. |
|
|
| (44087) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Jan 27 23:59:28 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Eric B on Thu Jan 27 12:24:44 2005. Minor detail. The M turns at Broad for about an hour in the evening, but that doesn't appear on the map. And the map doesn't show any 2's or 5's to Utica or New Lots. |
|
|
| (44643) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Arrow III MU on Sat Jan 29 08:54:07 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by italianstallion on Thu Jan 27 23:49:07 2005. Only during the rush hour, and if you noticed, the line is broken representing a part time service. So it is legit according to the current map. And I agree on the D train box, being it is now 2005. But overall, he did make an excellent map. Had me fooled.Jamie |
|
|
| (44735) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Sat Jan 29 15:25:13 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Arrow III MU on Sat Jan 29 08:54:07 2005. What I meant is that under the current A/C crisis, MTA has eliminated direct A train Rock Park service, even during rush hour. |
|
|
| (44737) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Sat Jan 29 15:39:58 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Arrow III MU on Sat Jan 29 08:54:07 2005. I agree, the map was very well done, but I think the A to Rkwy Pk should have been cut, because as italianstallion pointed out, there is no current service of the A to Rkwy Pk even during Rush. But I bet that there will be sometime in the next month, so I won't bother changing it.-James |
|
|
| (44753) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Flatbush41 on Sat Jan 29 17:31:58 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by David of Broadway on Thu Jan 27 23:59:28 2005. Okay but there isn't a need to really do so in my view, especially for the M trains that only go to Broad. |
|
|
| (44765) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Jan 29 18:43:37 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Broadway Buffer on Sat Jan 29 15:39:58 2005. But I bet that there will be sometime in the next month, so I won't bother changing it.I have the feeling that these special trains will be the last service to be restored. I've ridden them often and they're less important than getting some kind of C service back. |
|
|
| (44766) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Jan 29 18:44:06 2005, in response to Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:01:17 2005. Awesome. Looks real. How do you do it? |
|
|
| (45242) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Sun Jan 30 20:29:55 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Jan 29 18:43:37 2005. Oh, all right. I just thought that as A service increased in the next month, it would be feasible to have a 3rd terminal during the rush.-James |
|
|
| (45544) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Jan 31 13:00:31 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sat Jan 29 18:44:06 2005. MS Paint - yup the hard way, but I'm comfortable w/it. |
|
|
| (45546) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Jan 31 13:01:35 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by David of Broadway on Thu Jan 27 23:59:28 2005. Lol.Concidering I was aiming at mainly the A/C/V I don't think I'm gonna bother w/the 2/5/M lines. |
|
|
| (45549) | |
Re: Revised Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Jan 31 13:04:00 2005, in response to Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:01:17 2005. Oh um guys I changed the map so at least 2 things are gone the V terminal at 2nd av and the A to Rockaway Park.So now it should be better. ^_^ |
|
|
| (45554) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Mon Jan 31 13:14:40 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Jan 31 13:01:35 2005. The M is fine. I'm just pointing out that 2nd Avenue doesn't need to be listed as a V terminal even if some V's do terminate there. |
|
|
| (45578) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Jan 31 14:52:58 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by David of Broadway on Mon Jan 31 13:14:40 2005. Fine, I hope now the V issue is taken care of then? |
|
|
| (45581) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by mr_brian on Mon Jan 31 14:57:20 2005, in response to Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by M15 to South Ferry on Thu Jan 27 00:01:17 2005. Since when was the 104 St station on the J now refered to as "104-102 Sts?" o_O |
|
|
| (45582) | |
Re: Chambers-Aftermath map |
|
|
Posted by M15 to South Ferry on Mon Jan 31 15:04:07 2005, in response to Re: Chambers-Aftermath map, posted by mr_brian on Mon Jan 31 14:57:20 2005. Lol who knows?Well according to the MTA I guess :-p |
|
|
