|
|
| Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. (338552) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 6 |
||
|
| (339014) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:46:06 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:30:28 2006. I've ridden the cars in question hundreds of times. You haven't. Perhaps you're getting them confused with something else. |
|
|
| (339015) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:46:41 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:40:18 2006. OK. I hope that doesn't turn the 143 into a refrigerator. |
|
|
| (339016) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:47:05 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:44:54 2006. That would be true. |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (339017) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:48:42 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 17:16:51 2006. There was a period in time, for approximately a year, (2001) that the seats fit me perfectly. Before and after were and are pure pain. |
|
|
| (339018) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:49:06 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:46:06 2006. Yes, I have, and no, I'm not confused. You are confusing your own experience with everyone else's.Just as information: A characteristic of someone with Asperger's or Autism is that he/she cannot relate to others, and cannot conceive of others feeling differently. Think about that... |
|
|
| (339020) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:50:03 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:48:42 2006. Were you above or below a given weight? Did they change the seats, then change them again? |
|
|
| (339022) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:52:26 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:50:03 2006. Height and weight change, so I really cannot say whether they are comfortable for fatter people or for shorter people, but they sure as hell arent comfortable for taller people in fairly decent shape. |
|
|
| (339023) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:53:49 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:49:06 2006. Which brings up the question:Why are you unable to relate to people? |
|
|
| (339024) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:55:12 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:52:26 2006. Sorry to hear that. I feel very comfortable in that car.Well, if the TA hears from you and others perhaps there will be improvements. |
|
|
| (339025) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:56:20 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Wed Nov 15 23:53:49 2006. I have no problem relating at all. I also don't obsess over inanimate objects. |
|
|
| (339031) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 00:06:31 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:47:05 2006. Yes, I know.And the HVAC system in the R-142's is designed to work as I describe in my second sentence, unlike the older cars. |
|
|
| (339032) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 00:08:05 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:49:06 2006. I know of somebody in Kansas City who fits that definition to a tee. Maybe you'd like to give him your expert diagnosis. |
|
|
| (339039) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Thu Nov 16 00:26:18 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:56:20 2006. Maybe you cannot see it, but most people on this board find that you have serious issues communitating with others, getting quite frustrated when people dont agree with exactly what you say. going nuts and insulting everyone you are talking with is NOT an effective way of proving a point. It IS an effective way to show people that you have no ability to communicate. |
|
|
| (339043) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:34:47 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 00:06:31 2006. Your experience is not necessarily typical. If you are uncomfortable, I believe you, but you haven't shown that your experience speaks for everyone, or even most people. |
|
|
| (339044) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:36:00 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 00:08:05 2006. You know of no one but yourself. Too bad you don't have the self-insight to improve yourself. |
|
|
| (339046) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:38:29 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R30A on Thu Nov 16 00:26:18 2006. "but most people on this board find that you have serious issues communitating with others" False. A few foamers get frustrated with me, but that's really on them. I have occasionally been rough with a few people, but I point out behavior. Don't like it? Change behavior. Simple. When you get a little older you'll understand better. |
|
|
| (339068) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 16 05:50:24 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 21:27:19 2006. Keeping count, HMMMMMM |
|
|
| (339069) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Thu Nov 16 05:53:48 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by R4 Bryn Mawr LCL/R5 Paoli EXP on Wed Nov 15 21:32:13 2006. Aughhhh, the mental image of of Toiletpaper station in a 3some is enough to make me head for the hills. |
|
|
| (339075) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:36:42 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Wed Nov 15 23:26:53 2006. False, it doesn't. |
|
|
| (339076) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:37:45 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:40:54 2006. I hear you. |
|
|
| (339077) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:38:40 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Edwards! on Wed Nov 15 23:34:08 2006. I'm not the one discussing the inappropriate topic that you are... |
|
|
| (339078) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:40:24 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:38:29 2006. False, no one on this board respects you. |
|
|
| (339079) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 06:40:32 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Jace on Wed Nov 15 15:32:44 2006. In my opinion, the R160A's need to be burned some more...preferably to a crisp. |
|
|
| (339080) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:41:54 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:34:47 2006. Yes he has shown that, since everyone in this thread except for you agrees with him. |
|
|
| (339081) | |
STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Thu Nov 16 06:43:30 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:40:24 2006. |
|
|
| (339083) | |
STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Thu Nov 16 06:45:04 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:36:42 2006. |
|
|
| (339084) | |
STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by heypaul on Thu Nov 16 06:48:26 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 06:41:54 2006. You and Ron posted 193 posts out of a total of 650 in the last 24 hours. You both should be limited to 5 posts a day. I don't care if I get permanently banned in the process. Darius can't help himself. Apparently you and Ron can't either. You need help in stopping. Time is up... |
|
|
| (339088) | |
Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 06:53:49 2006, in response to STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by heypaul on Thu Nov 16 06:48:26 2006. [i]Darius can't help himself[/i]Darius? What's that? Sounds like something you get when you eat too much yogurt. |
|
|
| (339094) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 07:01:03 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 06:40:32 2006. Haha! Tell us why you think that! |
|
|
| (339096) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:06:16 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 07:01:03 2006. Well, I'm assuming that the R160a is essentially a clone of the R142b with some extra doohickeys installed like one of those little pine tree thingys on the windshield. If it is, then I automatically know that as soon as the rails get wet, I'm gonna have to say my prayers as soon as the anti-lock brakes kick in.10 car marker? They might have to create a 14. Not too mention all of the bucking that the 142b does, I hope they ironed out those kinks with the 160a. |
|
|
| (339097) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 07:08:00 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:06:16 2006. OH YOU'RE TOO MUCH!!!! Good to have you back. How long has it been?? |
|
|
| (339098) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:08:01 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:06:16 2006. >>>Not too mention all of the bucking that the 142b does, I hope they ironed out those kinks with the 160a.Not TO mention that my brain hasn't registered its morning coffee yet. |
|
|
| (339100) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:11:18 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 07:08:00 2006. It has been quite a while. Every time I thought about coming back, I'd see quite a few naughty posts that promptly beat that right out of my system (late December in 2005 wasn't a very good time to check out this board I would say.) I'll see how it all goes. |
|
|
| (339102) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 07:28:16 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Wed Nov 15 23:03:26 2006. When I sit down on an R-142 seat, the seat jabs me sharply in the back, at a point where my back does not bend. It is about as uncomfortable as a seat could possibly be.I also experience the same, also if you're tall sometimes you have to cross your legs when sitting since the seats seem a bit lower than the older Redbird type. Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (339105) | |
Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 07:40:16 2006, in response to Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 06:53:49 2006. [i]Darius can't help himself[/i]Try using < > instead of [ ], works for me. ZMAN's back, where ya been bro ! Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (339106) | |
Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:42:24 2006, in response to Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 07:40:16 2006. Thank you!I've been hiding under a rock...and not the "far" one either. Nice to talk to you again Bill! |
|
|
| (339110) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:46:47 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 07:28:16 2006. Yes, I've noticed that too -- even though I'm on the short side, I find the seats a bit low. And they seem to be a bit shallow, too, although at least that can be justified in that shallow seats in theory provide additional standing room. (But only in theory. In practice, they only provide additional standing room when nobody's sitting in them -- but if nobody's sitting in them, how much standing room do you need?) |
|
|
| (339112) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:48:08 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 06:40:32 2006. WOAH. You exist. Welcome home! |
|
|
| (339114) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:49:59 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:36:00 2006. I only know of one resident of Kansas City, and it ain't me. |
|
|
| (339115) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:51:44 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:48:08 2006. Wow, and you exist too! Existing is great, isn't it?Thanx for the welcome! |
|
|
| (339116) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:54:32 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 00:34:47 2006. That's funny. A lot of New Yorkers (who ride the cars on a regular basis), both here and elsewhere, have pointed out how ineffective the R-142 HVAC is.The only ones saying how wonderful the R-142 HVAC is are the ones who say that everything new must be wonderful in all ways, including somebody posting from halfway across the country who only rides the subway on occasional visits to New York. |
|
|
| (339117) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:56:57 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:51:44 2006. I exist, but my voice doesn't.Anybody up for a day of railfanning? |
|
|
| (339118) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 07:56:57 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:46:47 2006. I got a feeling a person who was 5' tall, thin build was used as a model when designing the seat.Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (339120) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 08:00:43 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 07:56:57 2006. I got a feeling a person who was 5' tall, thin build was used as a model when designing the seat.Well, if it worked for the R62's... (Love the bracket < > thingys!) |
|
|
| (339122) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Newkirk Images on Thu Nov 16 08:02:26 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by David of Broadway on Thu Nov 16 07:56:57 2006. Anybody up for a day of railfanning?Maybe one day when that big ball of light in the sky decides to come out. The weather has been crappy as of late. BTW, Yesterday I spotted one of those "Fishbowl" seats on the southbound Sea Beach platform at Bay Parkway. This was a four seater in charcoal gray with only two stainless steel armrests. This seat should have come out of the 3600-3900 series 1963 Fishbowl buses. Bill "Newkirk" |
|
|
| (339124) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Subterranean Railway on Thu Nov 16 08:09:17 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Nov 15 21:25:48 2006. It's the only justification you've given so far for opposing the R160s.Re-read all your RFW-related responses in this thread. |
|
|
| (339137) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Nov 16 08:29:14 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Subterranean Railway on Thu Nov 16 08:09:17 2006. Yes, it is the only problem I have mentioned very recently. But why does that mean it must be a major problem? I never said it was a major problem, ezcept relating to railfannning. Relating to commuting it is just a problem. |
|
|
| (339194) | |
Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 10:40:53 2006, in response to Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 07:11:18 2006. Pine tree thingys? Could you explain their function? |
|
|
| (339195) | |
Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over. |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 10:42:41 2006, in response to STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by heypaul on Thu Nov 16 06:48:26 2006. I realize you are trying to be helpful, and I do appreciate it, even if some of it is off-base.Thanks, but chill out. |
|
|
| (339196) | |
Re: do not eat yogurt on trains! |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Thu Nov 16 10:43:46 2006, in response to Re: STOP THE BULLSHIT...Re: R160a's Burn test Should be over., posted by Zman179 on Thu Nov 16 06:53:49 2006. LOL!Good one! |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 6 |
||
