|
|
| Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban (22870) | |
 |
|
| Home > SubChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 6 of 6 |
||
|
| (24370) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 30 15:55:39 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by R36 #9346 on Tue Nov 30 15:44:59 2004. So are the beggars (and non-beggars) that move between cars. |
|
|
| (24395) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Flatbush41 on Tue Nov 30 16:56:23 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Allan on Mon Nov 29 14:28:47 2004. Oh crap, I didn't see the date. Disregard my previous post then...... |
|
|
| (24409) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban - email link for comments |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Nov 30 17:28:14 2004, in response to NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Mark on Thu Nov 25 12:03:22 2004. Send comments to the MTA via the following link:http://mta-nyc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/mta_nyc.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_prod_lvl1=2&p_cat_lvl1=43 |
|
|
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
|
| (24476) | |
Public Comment |
|
|
Posted by Mark on Tue Nov 30 20:31:24 2004, in response to NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Mark on Thu Nov 25 12:03:22 2004. I've written my comprehensive public comment regarding the photo ban. You can read it at http://www.mentovai.com/mta/. If you like, feel free to "piggy-back" on my comment by telling the MTA that you agree with my analysis and oppose a ban. Details above.Thanks to all of you who've taken up the fight. Mark |
|
|
| (24479) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Tue Nov 30 20:48:00 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by BIE on Thu Nov 25 13:01:22 2004. Oh come on John.You can't blame the photo ban on Bush. This is a city issue not a federal one. Bush has not spoken out about the photo ban and I bet he probably is not concerned with it because it is not his concern in the first place. This is a typical liberal idea that desperate Demms are trying so they can blame anything and everything on Bush. I understand a lot of where and why Demms disagree with Bush on many thing. I disagree with a lot of stuff too, but you have to give credit where it's due and leave him out of it when he's not involved. Don't be a knee-jerk; STOP, THINK & USE some COMMON SENSE, John. -jAMES |
|
|
| (24481) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Tue Nov 30 20:49:51 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Broadway Buffer on Tue Nov 30 20:48:00 2004. It's a state issue cuz it's a state authority. Still not a Federal issue. The Washington Metro, now THAT would be a federal issue. |
|
|
| (24556) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 1 02:10:48 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Broadway Buffer on Tue Nov 30 20:48:00 2004. Nah, we all know this is CLINTON'S fault. :) |
|
|
| (24876) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Wed Dec 1 20:18:19 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Richard Rabinowitz on Tue Nov 30 20:49:51 2004. Yeah, I was thinking about that when I was typing that one up. I know that the MTA is NY State and not city. But the photo ban applies to NYCT I don't think that counts for all branches of the MTA, does it?But anyway, now that I think about, I think your right. But as you pointed out, same point applies. -James |
|
|
| (24878) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Buffer on Wed Dec 1 20:22:17 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 1 02:10:48 2004. No one has blamed it on Clinton, and I don't think anyone is going to come out and say that. I'm not to fond of those Republicans who blame Clinton for everything that goes wrong. I, even as someone who doesn't like Clinton too much, realize that that blaming is just foolish.-James |
|
|
| (24885) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by BIE on Wed Dec 1 20:50:47 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Broadway Buffer on Wed Dec 1 20:22:17 2004. Besides James would like Bill Clinton to be NYC mayor. |
|
|
| (24895) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Dec 1 21:09:14 2004, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Broadway Buffer on Wed Dec 1 20:22:17 2004. It's just amazing how so few will just grab the bull by the balls and say "moo." :) |
|
|
| (782705) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat May 9 13:59:56 2009, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by ®©® SIRTOA ®©® on Sun Nov 28 14:46:03 2004. No, no mods on this forum is also what makes it so kick ass. |
|
|
| (782706) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat May 9 14:01:44 2009, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat May 9 13:59:56 2009. Wow I just realized that I just necro posted, sorry about that guys I didn't pay attention to the date, now move along. |
|
|
| (782707) | |
Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Sat May 9 14:06:00 2009, in response to Re: NYCTA moves forward with photo ban, posted by Osmosis Jones on Sat May 9 14:01:44 2009. Too late, the damage is done. "now move along" indeed.your pal, Fred |
|
|
|
Page 6 of 6 |
||
