Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge (1638534) | |
![]() |
|
Home > SubChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
![]() |
(1638534) | |
Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Q65A on Mon Jan 13 10:18:10 2025 Calling for potential new tech solutions to help solve old problems:Transit Tech Lab 2025 |
|
![]() |
(1638546) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jan 13 14:21:41 2025, in response to Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Q65A on Mon Jan 13 10:18:10 2025. So 50 years ago Southern Pacific was instituting repair records systemwide so that an engine's entire mechanical/repair/failure records could be accessed at any shop facility system wide. IINM,Amtrak adopted a vendor designed preventive maintenance program for the Acelas. The idea was to schedule replacement of sub assemblies based on known life cycle data so as to reduce/eliminate failure on the road.I will say, no matter the field of endeavor, the largest impediment to all of these measures is the accounting/finance/dividends for shareholders segment of management jealously striving to save every last penny. Actually practicing intelligent maintenance procedures seems rare. |
|
![]() |
(1638575) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jan 14 08:04:21 2025, in response to Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jan 13 14:21:41 2025. NYCT implemented a comparable program in the early 1990s, called SMS where critical maintenance items were performed on a 2,4,5 7 or 12 year cycles. It's been fine tuned over 30 years to accommdate changes in technology. |
|
![]() |
(Sponsored) |
iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It |
![]() |
(1638576) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jan 14 08:04:22 2025, in response to Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jan 13 14:21:41 2025. NYCT implemented a comparable program in the early 1990s, called SMS where critical maintenance items were performed on a 2,4,5 7 or 12 year cycles. It's been fine tuned over 30 years to accommdate changes in technology. |
|
![]() |
(1638577) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jan 14 08:04:23 2025, in response to Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jan 13 14:21:41 2025. NYCT implemented a comparable program in the early 1990s, called SMS where critical maintenance items were performed on a 2,4,5 7 or 12 year cycles. It's been fine tuned over 30 years to accommdate changes in technology. |
|
![]() |
(1638578) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jan 14 08:04:23 2025, in response to Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jan 13 14:21:41 2025. NYCT implemented a comparable program in the early 1990s, called SMS where critical maintenance items were performed on a 2,4,5 7 or 12 year cycles. It's been fine tuned over 30 years to accommdate changes in technology. |
|
![]() |
(1638579) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Train Dude on Tue Jan 14 08:04:23 2025, in response to Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Jackson Park B Train on Mon Jan 13 14:21:41 2025. NYCT implemented a comparable program in the early 1990s, called SMS where critical maintenance items were performed on a 2,4,5 7 or 12 year cycles. It's been fine tuned over 30 years to accommdate changes in technology. |
|
![]() |
(1638580) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge |
|
Posted by Catfish 44 on Tue Jan 14 09:53:53 2025, in response to Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Q65A on Mon Jan 13 10:18:10 2025. Gee whiz I thought this was going to be about the high school |
|
![]() |
(1638606) | |
Re: Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge? |
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Jan 15 23:11:48 2025, in response to Transit Tech Lab 2025 Challenge, posted by Q65A on Mon Jan 13 10:18:10 2025. Everything "green", "zero-emission" blah-blah? Same left-wing garbage as before. |
|
![]() |