Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(1166366)

view threaded

Automated Trains Coming

Posted by WillD on Fri Jul 13 02:23:49 2012

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
... to Rio Tinto in NW Australia anyway. From Railway Gazette.

Rio Tinto automation contract confirmed

06 July 2012

AUSTRALIA: Train operations on Rio Tinto’s heavy haul iron ore railways in the Pilbara are to be fully automated by 2015 under two contracts announced on July 6. Valued at A$362m in total, the contracts have been exercised under the framework agreement which Rio Tinto signed with Ansaldo STS in 2010.

Forming a key part of Rio Tinto's AutoHaul project, the larger contract worth A$317·5m covers the development and delivery of an automated train management system for the 1 500 km network. Ansaldo STS says the first large-scale deployment of driverless heavy haul trains in the world will provide a significant enhancement in ‘flexibility and capacity’.

Ansaldo STS is to develop a modular signalling system including a centralised Vital Safety Server to manage train movements plus onboard ‘driving modules’ for the locomotives which will enable fully automatic operation. The conversion will re-use all existing lineside infrastructure, and is to be deployed with no disruption to train operations.

The second contract, worth A$44·7m, covers modifications to the locomotive fleet to enable the introduction of Electronically Controlled Pneumatic braking, as the next in a series of staged upgrades to boost capacity and efficiency. Ansaldo STS will also provide systems integration to support the installation of ECP braking across Rio Tinto’s entire rolling stock fleet, bringing significant improvements in the handling of heavy ore trains as part of the transition to full automation.
Funny how Rio Tinto, BHP, and the QNS&L can do OPTO and ZPTO for their freights which are FAR heavier than most trains on US mainline railroads by relying on advanced signalling systems, yet US railroads can't even install the rudimentary signalling systems the feds have mandated to provide modicum of train control.

Post a New Response

(1166381)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Jersey Mike on Fri Jul 13 07:44:23 2012, in response to Automated Trains Coming, posted by WillD on Fri Jul 13 02:23:49 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
*Yawn* Been there, done that.. Captive mining railroads have special operating circumstances that regular railroads do not enjoy. Train weight is not what makes automating freight trains difficult, it is train inconsistency. A 75 car fully loaded ore train will behave the same way day in, day out just like a 75 car empty ore train. The Hamersley & Robe River railway is completely isolated, it carries only these massive ore trainsets back and forth between the mines and the docks. You won't have trains with 15 loaded oil cars, 23 empty hi-cube box cars, 4 autoracks, 6 intermodal flats, 45 municipal waste cars, etc.

The signaling technology isn't what is at issue here. Ansaldo STS = US&S and most of this "technology" was probably developed in Pittsburgh. If a train has consistent handling characteristics when it is absolutely not a difficult task to automate. In addition to an even car loading profile you need consistent braking, which is why they are fitting Electrically Controlled Pneumatic braking. Unfortunately ECP is not practical for a general purpose freight network as seen in both the United States and the rest of Australia. ECP is very expensive and requires more advanced maintenance which will be hard to carry out anywhere you have cars being interchanged between railroads and sitting around rusting on industrial sidings. Second these ore trains are in a very high margin service. They roll 24/7 transporting goods that are seeing unprecedented demand on global markets. A hi-cube box car hauling newsprint to a local publishing facility is not in a high margin service that can justify the expense of ECP braking.

Also don't forget that the Hamersley & Robe River railway, in addition to the QNS&L run through Max Mad country with few grade crossings and few local residents. Because ore trainsets are never uncoupled while in transit you don't need a second crew-member. Anyway, why don't you go learn how trains work before you go spreading your "let's make everything rapid transit" gospel. Let's see what happens when one of your light weight DMU's mixes it up with a (potentially) driverless freight train. Oooo, not so great.

Post a New Response

(1166423)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Fri Jul 13 10:14:22 2012, in response to Automated Trains Coming, posted by WillD on Fri Jul 13 02:23:49 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Not even remotely worried about this coming here to main line railroading before I retire!!!

Post a New Response

(Sponsored)

iPhone 6 (4.7 Inch) Premium PU Leather Wallet Case - Red w/ Floral Interior - by Notch-It

(1166427)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Jersey Mike on Fri Jul 13 10:27:07 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Train Man Paul : Metro-North's Best Conductor FOR ALL 3 LINES!!! on Fri Jul 13 10:14:22 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
You should be worried if you do passenger operations. In 10-20 years you should expect fully automated commuter rail operation including door controls. I'm sure there will still be some sort of attendant on board, but their job will be more customer service than driving the train. Best part is you don't even need a new signaling system. All the technology that is currently realizing autonomous road vehicles can be used to trivially implement autonomous rail vehicles, and you won't even need specially built equipment. Such trains would be able to stop for obstructions, properly line up at platforms, work the doors and answer most rider questions.

Freight will continue to need people up to the point railroad start employing androids to throw hand switches and reconnect brake lines.

Post a New Response

(1166428)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Jul 13 10:32:28 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Jersey Mike on Fri Jul 13 10:27:07 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Freight will be the first to go fully automatic.

You are thinking of a piddling little peddler freight. That gets a one-man crew with a remote control box for switching.

Freight out here is made up in one yard or terminal and broken up in another yard or terminal. In between it needs no crew. Between signalling and GPS and equipment available now it is just a matter of doing it.

ROAR

Post a New Response

(1166429)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Railman718 on Fri Jul 13 10:36:11 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Jul 13 10:32:28 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Small thinking no surprise coming from him...

Post a New Response

(1166440)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by orange blossom special on Fri Jul 13 12:55:59 2012, in response to Automated Trains Coming, posted by WillD on Fri Jul 13 02:23:49 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
It's interesting that there is so much money going on in these operations, with China buying it's own lines and ports as well, that after all this cashflow and investments, there isn't much need for anyone to actually do the work!

Post a New Response

(1166444)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Jul 13 13:17:02 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by orange blossom special on Fri Jul 13 12:55:59 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Only if you want to earn money.

ROAR

Post a New Response

(1166448)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by SUBWAYSURF on Fri Jul 13 13:34:43 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Broadway Lion on Fri Jul 13 13:17:02 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
OBS is happy living off his parents

Post a New Response

(1166453)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Outside the Box on Fri Jul 13 14:05:10 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Jersey Mike on Fri Jul 13 07:44:23 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
As per the articles you provided, human error and foggy conditions were the causes of the DMU freight train head on collision. The freight operator ran past both the distant and main signal, the switch set for the passenger train, and didn't respond to a radio call from a train director until after the collision. If Deutsche Bahn had installed ATP on that line, as they had been putting off, the accident wouldn't had happened.

Post a New Response

(1166475)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Jersey Mike on Fri Jul 13 16:55:09 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Outside the Box on Fri Jul 13 14:05:10 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
My point is that since you can't prevent all train-train collisions due to the fact that heavy North American style freight trains can derail without warning (or pick points on a crossover, etc) at any time so railcars need to be built assuming that collisions will happen. That is the result when one of Will's favourite DMU's with "crash energy management" gets into an accident.

Post a New Response

(1166478)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Dutchrailnut on Fri Jul 13 17:22:52 2012, in response to Automated Trains Coming, posted by WillD on Fri Jul 13 02:23:49 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
not much automation needed ever see where Rio Tinto operates ?
Double track and no traffic, no tree's, etc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jP4-iFIafUo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmlAQS45Z0A



Post a New Response

(1166578)

view threaded

Re: Automated Trains Coming

Posted by Outside the Box on Sat Jul 14 12:03:04 2012, in response to Re: Automated Trains Coming, posted by Jersey Mike on Fri Jul 13 16:55:09 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Conventional US passenger rail cars don't do very well either. FRA trialed Crash Energy Management additions to conventional designs and they worked far better than conventional FRA compliant passenger rail cars.

The head on collision had a combined speed of over 80+mph. Beyond 40mph, its better to focus on preventing accidents. You can have rail cars designed for crashes at 60+mph, but they are very heavy or require expensive materials (CNT aluminum composites).

Another strategy us to run a lightweight crash car ahead and behind the passenger cars. It may carry postal packages. The train operator can have a remote operator station with live video feed from many sections of the train. The same may apply to the front and rear of freight trains in certain cases (HSR running with freight). If there is a collision, that car absorbs the crash energy.

Part of preventing accidents is better monitoring. Freight locomotives could be equipped with track sensors to detect rail defects as they pass through. As consumer and industrial MEMS and electronics come down in cost, wayside hotbox and dragging equipment detectors and signal equipment can double as acoustic and seismic detectors to look for bad wheels.

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]