Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) (791741)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ Next in Thread ]

view flat

Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?)

Posted by Widecab5 on Tue Jun 2 12:25:31 2009 edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d On May 21, 2009 there were 50 R-40's. On May 26, 2009 there were 44 R-40's. On May 29, 2009 there were 34 R-40's. On May 31, 2009 there were 32 R-40's: 4176/4177, 4218/4219, 4246/4247, 4256/4257, 4280/4281, 4300/4301, 4342/4343, 4346/4347, 4354-4357, 4370/4371, 4390/4391, 4398/4399, 4414/4415, 4424/4425, 4432/4433. ...and 84 R-46's on the A 6126-6193, 6198-6205, 6206/6207, 6232/6234, 6244/6246, 6256/6258. Regards, George Chiasson Jr. (Widecab5@aol.com)

Responses

• Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Chris R16/R2730 - Tue Jun 2 12:36:51 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Widecab5 - Tue Jun 2 17:59:30 2009
• Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Newkirk Images - Tue Jun 2 19:51:13 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - joe c - Tue Jun 2 21:04:08 2009
    • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - North-Easten T/O - Wed Jun 3 01:10:08 2009
      • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - joe c - Wed Jun 3 10:58:46 2009
      • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Newkirk Images - Wed Jun 3 19:19:40 2009
        • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Bill From Maspeth - Wed Jun 3 20:29:11 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Bill From Maspeth - Wed Jun 3 20:24:49 2009
• Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - milan1834 - Tue Jun 2 20:05:27 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Bill From Maspeth - Wed Jun 3 20:30:44 2009
• Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - murray1575 - Tue Jun 2 20:11:27 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - ENY Blitz 5107 - Tue Jun 2 21:15:45 2009
    • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - SubwayNut - Tue Jun 2 21:24:25 2009
      • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Grand Concourse - Thu Jun 4 00:16:12 2009
• Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - SubBus aka ENY Local - Wed Jun 3 01:52:55 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Bill From Maspeth - Wed Jun 3 20:33:41 2009
    • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Grand Concourse - Thu Jun 4 00:15:34 2009
• Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - SubBus aka ENY Local - Wed Jun 3 01:53:04 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - olivermuc - Wed Jun 3 05:19:08 2009
    • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - RailBus63 - Wed Jun 3 08:56:15 2009
      • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Bill From Maspeth - Wed Jun 3 20:16:28 2009
    • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Bill From Maspeth - Wed Jun 3 20:23:22 2009
  • Re: Setting Aside The Slants--And Then There Were Three (or is it just Two?) - Grand Concourse - Thu Jun 4 00:14:47 2009

Post a New Response