|
|
| Re: KTLA CONFIRMS: But should we jump to conclusions? (681196) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: KTLA CONFIRMS: But should we jump to conclusions? |
|
|
Posted by Broadway Lion on Sun Sep 14 15:32:06 2008, in response to Re: KTLA CONFIRMS: But should we jump to conclusions?, posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Sun Sep 14 14:01:03 2008. The approach slow signal was already behind him. But that was irrelevant because he was going to stop at the station anyway. He *should* have stayed there waiting for the UP to clear.Apparently they do not use track warrants in that territory. So he *forgot* that he was still under a restricting aspect when he left the station, he still had the homeball in front of him. Maybe the Railroad *should* text message the signals to him. ROARING |
|
|
|