|
|
| Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. (646050) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by Jeff H. on Tue Jul 8 18:47:39 2008, in response to Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by Mr Mabstoa on Tue Jul 8 03:47:02 2008. Right, the big difference is nearly 100% of the available floorarea of a commuter or rapid transit car is being used for passenger space. All of the mechanical equipment is overhead or underfloor. So to add "crumple zones" would mean reducing capacity. |
|
|
|