|
|
| Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. (642632) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE. |
|
|
Posted by trainsarefun on Tue Jul 1 11:51:32 2008, in response to Since We are on the subject....TIME TO SHOW HOW ROBUST THE OLD SMEES ARE., posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Jul 1 11:24:22 2008. While I know that you are already the expert of all things in your own mind, do you know what happens to people when they are located in the parts of cars you have pictured that have been completely torn away?How is it that you can count large portions of a car simply horrifically collapsed and torn as a sign of strength? If robert ray were piloting an R12 during the union square catastrophe, maybe the only damage would be like the damage on the car above... the frames would keep the car together well. What is your experience in engineering???? Answer the question, or stop posting your speculative BS. The way to stop the Union Square wreck is (1) to prevent severely intoxicated employees from trying to perform their duties, (2) for the conductor on Robert Ray's train to have done his job, (3) for Robert Ray to know what a bottom yellow aspect on a signal means, and (4) probably wheel detectors, given that NYCT doesn't have a unviersal speed control system. |
|
|
|