|
|
| Re: Second Ave Alignment Change (637304) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Second Ave Alignment Change |
|
|
Posted by RonInBayside on Sat Jun 21 02:52:57 2008, in response to Re: Second Ave Alignment Change, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat Jun 21 02:43:32 2008. "Heh. Well, at this point I s'pose I'm supposed to sit here and self-flagellate for not taking BW's SAGE advice in "don't answer the PHONE, man ... because I think it's bugged, man" ... heh."Only if you enjoy self-flagellation. Birch works well - they use it in Finland in the sauna to improve circulation. Otherwise, leave Brian alone. He can'rt help himself, but you can. "As I've indicated, I don't DO "big dig" and neither do YOU" But I understand cost accounting and you do NOT. That puts you at a disadvantage. Do yourself a favor: Get a good cost accounting book and start reading. Horngren, Foster, Datar is a pretty good one. "MY opinion is that before such is cut from the project, those who are makking the decisions as to removing that availability simply need to SREIOUSLY think about it before committing to an "irreversable outcome" My guess is they needed to take a serious chunk out of the budget so they could award the 72nd St contract at all. Yes, they justt increased the cost of adding more tracks tremendously, astronomically. The alternative is having the project founder right now. Get over it. Leave the whining about three tracks to the foamers and get back to reality. "You see saints in bean-counters, I see unemployment" I'm sorry you never learned to work with them. Maybe they looked at you with the same jaundiced eye. |
|
|
|