Home · Maps · About

Home > SubChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Bad data; Diagrams Re: Air Train question

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Mar 10 10:27:26 2008, in response to Re: Bad data; Diagrams Re: Air Train question, posted by RonInBayside on Sun Mar 9 11:32:46 2008.

edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The number of passengers has climbed enough so that AirTraiun's absolute usage has climbed with it. Even if AirTrain's % of arriving airline passengers remains below 4%, its impact on car traffic to the airport has been very tangible.

I don't have access to traffic counts for the airport's internal roadways. You're welcome to produce them.

Who picked 4% as a meaningful threshold? You?

We should speak hypothetically, by the way, because your numbers are wrong. You cite 3.68% in 2002; AirTrain did not begin operating until 2003.
Given that, I wouldn't trust any of your numbers.


I picked 4% because it is near the low end of pre-AirTrain usage (note I said "between 3.5% and 6.5% per month) and the high end of AirTrain usage. The only month between opening and the end of 2007 that broke 4% is September, 2004. It isn't an indicator of anything except relative performance.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]