|
|
| Re: Air Train question (579708) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Air Train question |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Mar 2 21:46:43 2008, in response to Re: Air Train question, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Mar 2 21:42:00 2008. Yes, they could either charge the parking lot people on that PAID branch of Airtrain, or they could waive it for the parking lot people as they have. Not waiving it would have been a bigger semantics problem than the present one.There's no reason is has to be a paid branch by default. In fact, it's a free branch by default. You just pay a ped toll to get onto the property. That's a fact. It's a FEE to use their airtrain on that line. That's what they want you to think, but it's not true. If it was a fee to use airtrain, then everyone would have to pay it. They don't. The people being carried from the subway or from the west end of the parking lot are receiving the SAME EXACT SERVICE, yet are being charged differently. It's obvious. Who cares, and there is nothing that says a fee can't be charged for a "circulator" or for an extention of said circulator. What happens elsewhere is irrelavent. It's called precedent. There is none. No it's not, that's an opinion. An opinion that has no more push than an opinion that it's justified. Right. The unanimous decision of every airport in the country in this situation is that the on-property circulator is free, and that no fare is charged from adjacent transit stations. JFK is going against the unanimous decision. |
|
|
|