|
|
| Re: Retirement Plans for R44/46? (50625) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Retirement Plans for R44/46? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Feb 14 07:59:57 2005, in response to Re: Retirement Plans for R44/46?, posted by RonInBayside on Mon Feb 14 07:02:52 2005. Not to worry, I'm in upstate New York ... dotCA addresses account for more of the people I communicate with than dotUS. :)And 62A's don't require as much "shoe effort" as 75 footers, so if it's the same stuff, I can see some issues. I never could FATHOM why the pipe was so "hot" on the 44's and 46's ... as you know with pneumatics, it's log scaling and the higher you need to go, the more "muscular the beaver" ("Angry Beavers" cartoon show gag) in order to give it "AHNOLD-like pumpitude" ... for 140-150 PSI, you need one HELL of a muscular beaver to keep that tank charged. And only ONE per two cars only makes the issue worse since you're doing twice the work as opposed to the ancient realities of one compressor for each CAR ... Thanks for the links - will check it later, but if "Dude" says they're not quite satisfactory, I won't argue with him ... we ALL have our own areas of intense expertise even if we're anacephlic in others. Here I won't argue with him other than "woof! You need THAT much PSI? For phucking WHAT?!?!?!" :) |
|
|
|