|
|
| Re: So You Want To Get A Photo Permit? (456238) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: So You Want To Get A Photo Permit? |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Jul 5 13:57:29 2007, in response to Re: So You Want To Get A Photo Permit?, posted by Bob Andersen on Thu Jul 5 13:45:08 2007. Paragraph D is clearly unconstitutional, IMHO. No one can prohibit you, or attach limitations on, taking pictures from public property of anything that is in clear view. There are some exceptions such as military installations or nuclear facilities.Section II (in my link) makes clear that they are only talking about WITHIN the system, not from public property. As for the rest, if PATH were a private individual or corporation, they can prohibit or limit you from taking photos while on their property, but the question is - is PATH (or the MTA for that matter) public or private property? Yeah, that's the issue. For that same reason, any public system (like say MBTA or SEPTA) that can't show where in the "state code" (or the like) they have the authority to regulate photography, I don't listen to their stated photography rules. |
|
|
|