|
|
| Re: Some Subways Found Packed Past Capacity (452251) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Some Subways Found Packed Past Capacity |
|
|
Posted by shadyelstation on Tue Jun 26 20:08:33 2007, in response to Re: Some Subways Found Packed Past Capacity, posted by WillD on Tue Jun 26 16:07:37 2007. Pardon? How would that work? A new tunnel under the East River or somehow joining the 63rd St tunnel then avoiding the connector with the Queens Blvd lines?The SAS FEIS mentions construction of non-revenue connections to Queens using parts of the 63 St Connector. If such a line would run in revenue it would probably be via Queens Blvd (which could pose a problem due to capacity issues already present on Queens Blvd). Why not find a way to connect the SAS to what might be called the South 4th St subway Would this South 4th Street subway connect to, say, a Utica Avenue Subway (to Kings Plaza)? An idea I have for such a line is to have a branch of SAS turn south of 14 St, onto Houston St, going to South 4 and eventually running under Utica to Kings Plaza. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|