|
|
| Re: Technical Details Required... (Cop Incident Update) (435411) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Technical Details Required... (Cop Incident Update) |
|
|
Posted by JPC on Thu May 24 23:11:54 2007, in response to Re: Technical Details Required... (Cop Incident Update), posted by Jeff Rosen on Mon May 21 18:19:56 2007. Deletion of photos is destruction of property.If this officer came up to someone and (for the sake of argument), took something out of their purse and intentionally broke it, would that officer be "doing their job?" No, on the contrary, unless they have a valid reason to seize the property (i.e. it is contraband or being used in the commission of a crime) they are acting in a manner utterly incompatible with their job description. The law says that subway photos are NOT contraband. The law says that subway photos are NOT illegal. Nilet was NOT committing a crime when he took those photos. Therefore the officer had absolutely zero justification in seizing and/or destroying Nilet's property. Yet the officer did so anyway, and quite blatantly and intentionally at that. I really don't have a clue how I can make it any more elementary than that. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|