|
|
| Re: Extending E may not work well (418246) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Extending E may not work well |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Apr 20 18:48:05 2007, in response to Re: Extending E may not work well, posted by RonInBayside on Thu Apr 19 15:04:21 2007. F on hillside is roughly adequate. E on Parsons is severely underserved. Of course, if hillside were underserved to a greater degree then archer, it may make sense to run some E trains to 179, but when the only reason why parsons archer doesnt have the full E service it requires is a lack of ability to physically run it, then ideally, the MTA would run more service to archer, diverting the hillside E trains to archer |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|