Re: Brooklyn subway needs (326227)		Home · Maps · About
Home > SubChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: Brooklyn subway needs

Posted by J trainloco on Thu Oct 19 19:29:59 2006, in response to Re: Brooklyn subway needs, posted by Osmosis Jones on Thu Oct 19 19:26:41 2006. edf40wrjww2msgDetail:detailStr fiogf49gjkf0d Yeah, that's great if we're planning in a vacuum. But such a plan would not be feasible. Use of the Bay Ridge ROW (connecting at it's west end to ANY subway line it crosses, though I often suggest the Crosstown/Culver due to it's relative underuse) would be an efficient means of extending service to southeastern Brooklyn.

Responses

• Re: Brooklyn subway needs - Osmosis Jones - Thu Oct 19 19:38:11 2006
  • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - NIMBYkiller - Thu Oct 19 22:28:56 2006
    • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - J trainloco - Thu Oct 19 23:10:28 2006
      • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - The Port of Authority - Fri Oct 20 00:09:29 2006
        • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - J trainloco - Fri Oct 20 00:10:55 2006
          • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - The Port of Authority - Fri Oct 20 00:13:30 2006
            • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - RonInBayside - Fri Oct 20 00:14:20 2006
            • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - J trainloco - Fri Oct 20 00:17:02 2006
              • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - The Port of Authority - Fri Oct 20 00:18:31 2006
                • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - RonInBayside - Fri Oct 20 00:22:13 2006
          • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - Rail Blue - Fri Oct 20 15:36:56 2006
            • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - R4 Bryn Mawr LCL/R5 Paoli EXP - Fri Oct 20 18:57:22 2006
              • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - Rail Blue - Sun Oct 22 07:09:29 2006
      • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - NIMBYkiller - Fri Oct 20 03:13:44 2006
        • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - D to E to Jamaica - Fri Oct 20 06:07:13 2006
          • Re: Brooklyn subway needs - NIMBYkiller - Fri Oct 20 14:54:18 2006

Post a New Response