|
|
| Re: R46 Technology (was: Re: R-160 Update) (315000) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: R46 Technology (was: Re: R-160 Update) |
|
|
Posted by J trainloco on Sun Sep 24 20:22:54 2006, in response to Re: R46 Technology (was: Re: R-160 Update), posted by Edwards! on Sun Sep 24 17:36:14 2006. Not every plan was shot down...look at what happening today in downtown Brooklyn..where a Airtrain station is being planned near MetroTECHHaha. That wasteful garbage plan?!?!? LOL! along with a extention into Brooklyn for the SAS subway. There are no plans for this on the table. It definitely won't happen in your lifetime. I DO have a few misgivings ...a proposed reroute of the Brighton Local to the Smith Street subway..and a Rutgers to Dekalb connection should have been built! Rutgers to DeKalb is worthwhile only if the Manhattan Bridge needs to be decomissioned as a rail bridge. Seeing as they just invested millions into its rehabilitation, restoring full service, then a Rutgers/DeKalb connection is a waste. Pick one or the other. Regarding the Brighton Local via Smith: that would be a waste of money, spending it in an area that already has a flood of services. Never the less..if the needs of the people come FIRST,Then a way WILL be found to push needed rapid transit to deserving neoghborhoods. Hey..it works. If you need proff..look to the Eastside sometime later this year. LOL. Never use SAS as an example of something positive. It was first announced almost 80 years ago. |
|
|
|