|
|
| Re: Richmond Hill (202432) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Richmond Hill |
|
|
Posted by NIMBYkiller on Wed Jan 18 17:59:04 2006, in response to Re: Richmond Hill, posted by Line 13 on Wed Jan 18 12:53:56 2006. The reason ridership was so low was b/c1. Next to no one knew that the service even existed. Have you ever even seen photos of the former "stations"? They were virtually non-existant. 2. Service was awful. People do work in the industrial areas and that's why the line has potential. And I agree, it would be best if connected to a new East River tunnel to NYP. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|