Re: N to 96/2 (1423198) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by R30A on Sat Jan 7 15:12:44 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Joe V on Sat Jan 7 15:07:34 2017. WPR 5s are on the map, as are Rock Park As. E to 179 is a problem, but one without a better solution.If there were a standard service via 8th avenue that went to 179, (Lets call it the K, Lefferts-179, express in Brooklyn, local in Manhattan) The Es to 179 would surely be signed as K. Yes, the timetable should be fixed, as that is the problem. Not the train signs. |
(There are no responses to this message.)