Re: N to 96/2 (1423096) | |||
Home > SubChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
Posted by Dyre Dan on Sat Jan 7 07:47:35 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Fri Jan 6 14:11:25 2017. If these trains were called N, the entrance signs at 63rd/Lex wouldn't have to say FQ, which can be read as "F__k you". Instead, they could be read as FNQ, which could be read as "F__'n Q". |