|
|
| Re: N to 96/2 (1422704) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: N to 96/2 |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Jan 4 18:23:30 2017, in response to Re: N to 96/2, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Jan 4 18:17:13 2017. I mostly buy your argument. I also think it's not a very important issue.However, until 1/1/2017, NYCT didn't care that people headed for 49th Street had to pay close attention to what type of N they were riding on, and it didn't concern them enough to sign 57/7-bound Ns as Qs. PS. There were occasions prior to 2017 when the destination of the N was changed from Astoria to 57/7 after the train left Coney Island, for reasons of congestion or load balancing. I'm sure that will happen again and occasional Ns will suddenly become Qs in mid-trip. |
|
|
|