|
|
| Re: SAS termini questions (127562) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: SAS termini questions |
|
|
Posted by Rail Blue on Tue Aug 16 05:54:15 2005, in response to Re: SAS termini questions, posted by stephenk on Mon Aug 15 13:31:20 2005. Of the three above terminus types, and the flying junction terminus, I much prefer the non-passenger loop for offering both high capacity, and flexible or reliable headways. However, where loop construction is not suitable (e.g narrow sites), I think that the flying junction terminus would be most suitable.Actually, you probably have a point, at least outdoors. I'm thinking of a redesign of London Charing X... Strangely, given the proven advantages of non-passenger loops, I know of none that have been built since the 1920s in heavy metro systems! ( Can someone correct me on this?) Just shows we should build by the Belgian and Madrid methods. |
|
|
|