|
|
| Re: Wouldn't 67-foot cars make more sense? (1252041) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > SubChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Wouldn't 67-foot cars make more sense? |
|
|
Posted by Wallyhorse on Sun Oct 6 04:17:26 2013, in response to Re: Wouldn't 67-foot cars make more sense?, posted by CJ on Sat Oct 5 18:00:10 2013. Did I ever say it had to be the BMT Standard?It would make much more sense to from now on have ALL new cars be 67 feet. That length seems to be a fair compromise and would add flexibility, especially if it's done to where you can somehow have all front and rear cars designed to where they can have all the doors of a 670' train fit a 660' station (or as noted in another post, lengthen all stations outside the Eastern Division to 670' to handle 10 67-footers). |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|