|
|
| They see me pollin' they hatin' (937113) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (937113) | |
They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:20:29 2012 http://www.gallup.com/poll/150743/Obama-Romney.aspx
|
|
|
| (937116) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 13:27:50 2012, in response to They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:20:29 2012. No date, no data, no point. |
|
|
| (937123) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:42:22 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 13:27:50 2012. Can you read? That's today's results. Bookmark it, cuz it's always changing (that's what a tracking poll does). Romney is also up 2 points with Rasmussen |
|
|
| (937129) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 13:56:47 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:42:22 2012. I didn't see any date. Nor do I buy into polls at this point. BTW...Presidential approval is 50%. Debunks Ras. They aren't asking a large enough or geographically diverse sample pool. |
|
|
| (937132) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:21:26 2012, in response to They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:20:29 2012. LOL!!! No Obama's rating is in a nosedive, so Gallup won't be Gospel like it was a couple days ago. LMAO. |
|
|
| (937133) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:21:53 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 13:27:50 2012. ??? It's a daily poll. It's the same poll you thought was better than sex the other day. |
|
|
| (937134) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:22:50 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 13:56:47 2012. There's always a date. It's done DAILY. You leftists were orgasming the other day with what it said, and now it's gotten quiet again. |
|
|
| (937135) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 14:26:32 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:21:26 2012. 2 weeks ago, Gallup was a right wing pollster. Last week, they were the most accurate pollsters. Now, even as I type this, libs are tweeting it's back to being a right wing pollster. |
|
|
| (937136) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 14:27:17 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:21:53 2012. Better than sex? Um, Selkirk .... |
|
|
| (937140) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:29:46 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 14:26:32 2012. Yes. That's why I am laughing about it. When I would post a Gallup poll, I would be told here it was right wing and highly inaccurate. Last week, all the same people were tripping over themselves and orgasming, and it was the most accurate poll. As you said, this week, the usual suspects of the left will be saying how right wing the poll is, forgetting about the orgasmic mess they left on the floor last week. |
|
|
| (937156) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Mon Apr 30 15:09:10 2012, in response to They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:20:29 2012. Who gives a crap about these and other polls? They haven't even had a face to face debate yet, so we can't see who can handle the heat better. These polls at this point are only good for toilet paper. |
|
|
| (937158) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 15:20:28 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by ClearAspect on Mon Apr 30 15:09:10 2012. Liberals care. Well, whenever Obama has a lead they care.Back to you, Rosanna. |
|
|
| (937162) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 15:27:28 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by ClearAspect on Mon Apr 30 15:09:10 2012. No one, but last week we were bombarded from your friends on the left when the polls said the opposite, and you didn't say a word to them about "who gives a crap". Just returning the favor. |
|
|
| (937163) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 15:28:12 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 15:20:28 2012. Yup, last week they were tripping over themselves with all these polls when they said the opposite, and then they were wonderful polls, no you got to love the "who cares about polls" responses.... |
|
|
| (937164) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by ClearAspect on Mon Apr 30 15:32:52 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 15:27:28 2012. The other Chris bombards them with polls then feels butt hurt when it swings back at him in the other way. Then whines, a troll tactic then calls out the left for the polls. He's a hypocrite at most. |
|
|
| (937166) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Mon Apr 30 15:39:57 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by ClearAspect on Mon Apr 30 15:09:10 2012. It was the night before the 2002 Vermont gubernatorial election and I went to sleep with the majority of polls showing Jim Douglas (R) trailing Doug Racine (D) by 10% in the race to replace Howard Dean. Douglas defeated Racine 45% - 42%. Douglas went on to be re-elected 3 times which for Vermont, by and large a progressive leaning, Democratic constituency, was an extraordinary accomplishment. To better illustrate my point, Grace Potter of the band Grace Potter and the Nocturnals was raised in my small town of Waitsfield. I do not like that band so I will not provide any pictures, clips, or links, and thanks again. |
|
|
| (937167) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 30 15:40:12 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 14:29:46 2012. Never said Gallup is RW. You must mean Rasmussen. |
|
|
| (937172) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 15:48:19 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 30 15:40:12 2012. No, it was Gallup. I didn't say it was you personally. Selkirk for sure. Some others too. Not to mention you WERE praising the poll last week when it said what you wanted it to say. |
|
|
| (937186) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 16:57:14 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:42:22 2012. OK, where's the date. Yes, the site is dated. The article/poll isn't. Therefore, subterfuge is possible.
|
|
|
| (937188) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by cortelyounext on Mon Apr 30 16:59:24 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 16:57:14 2012. Please stop using Latin like anthropomorphic and subterfuge in your posts, and as always, thanks for everything. |
|
|
| (937200) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 30 17:52:06 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Mon Apr 30 15:48:19 2012. And Train Dude, the other Chris and others were praising the polls they like. So what else is new? |
|
|
| (937203) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 30 17:55:52 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by cortelyounext on Mon Apr 30 16:59:24 2012. "Anthropomorphic" is Greek. |
|
|
| (937227) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 19:24:02 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by ClearAspect on Mon Apr 30 15:32:52 2012. Huh? I'm the one downplaying the polls. Perhaps my sarcastic demeanor did not register with you. I don't really know who will win this race and neither do you. However, I hear a lot more unsupportable confidence coming from the left than right. |
|
|
| (937229) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 19:28:18 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by italianstallion on Mon Apr 30 17:52:06 2012. No, we weren't praising the polls, we were mocking you and others who have orgasm every time The One's numbers jump, particularly with polls that have horrific oversamples of Democrats. |
|
|
| (937238) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Apr 30 20:00:41 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 19:28:18 2012. 
|
|
|
| (937244) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Apr 30 20:27:48 2012, in response to They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:20:29 2012. Bump from cinching the nomination. Nothing to see here. |
|
|
| (937265) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Apr 30 21:16:03 2012, in response to They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Mon Apr 30 13:20:29 2012. I hate these polls because they are purposely structured to force people into the two party system... I wish they would have a third option, "I hate them both and would rather not vote for either..." |
|
|
| (937268) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Mon Apr 30 21:18:39 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Apr 30 21:16:03 2012. That would stop all polling dead, and that's not a bad thing :)your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (937269) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 21:18:51 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by cortelyounext on Mon Apr 30 16:59:24 2012. Then I assume Abyssinian is right out. :-) |
|
|
| (937409) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue May 1 08:59:43 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by bingbong on Mon Apr 30 16:57:14 2012. OK, where's the date.On the graph, along the X-axis. No, it doesn't have vertical lines for each day, but if you scale it off it's obvious that it ends in late April. On the front page, it's in the right column. "GALLUP DAILY Apr 27-29, 2012 – Updates daily at 1 p.m. ET; reflects one-day change...PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Romney 47% +1 Obama 46% -1 5-day rolling average." If you click either "Obama" or "Romney" it brings you to the graph. |
|
|
| (937412) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Tue May 1 09:08:38 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Apr 30 21:16:03 2012. I hate these polls because they are purposely structured to force people into the two party system... I wish they would have a third option, "I hate them both and would rather not vote for either..."47+46≠100 |
|
|
| (937413) | |
Re: They see me pollin' they hatin' |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue May 1 09:11:12 2012, in response to Re: They see me pollin' they hatin', posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Apr 30 21:16:03 2012. I hate them because the question is "if the election were held today." This is irrelevant because it's not being held today. The better question would be: Unless you learn something between now and then that would make you change your mind, whom do you expect to vote for next election day? |
|
|