|
|
| Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) (317859) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 7 of 7 |
||
|
| (318820) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 16 04:42:02 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 04:23:04 2008. THEY are not very nice people, no.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (318822) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 05:44:50 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by Fred G on Fri May 16 04:42:02 2008. Sorry ... you KNOW how I used to go back and forth with occasionally deep philosophicals (and footnotes) but it's really hard to even TRY anymore given that OTchat is now serving up those so-called "transcripts" offered at a price at the end of shouting shows you'd never watch again. I'm always happy to kibbitz and argue back and forth with someone who has an actual opinion of their OWN ... alas. :(I've wasted SO much time asking "what was it that Bin Laden wanted?" 1. Screw America by bringing the price of oil over $100. 2. Make Americans SO afraid that they'll screw their own over by going and enacting draconian regime on their own whilst piddling pants. 3. Make them afraid to fly (partial here: TSA and the AIRLINES did it) 4. Turn them against each other. 5. Turn the world against them. Aha! MISSION ACCOMPLISHED! :( No WONDER the Bin Laden family and Bush remain tight to this day. :( But no, let's whine about Germany instead. :-\ I'll just leave it at POGO once again ... GOOD NEWS is that everybody's tired of all this. The world is doing to us what Reagan did to the Soviet Union. Let's PRAY we don't end up with an equal aftermath. Here we have people demanding that we nuke other countries after observing that the Chinese are smart enough to make "war" on us in the same way. The TRUE war ... the one I'm engaged in right now with the bankruptcy court ... ECONOMICS ... "the final solution." :( But no ... let the crackpots and their blogs and their focus on OTHER countries continue to blind them to where the REAL problem is. |
|
|
| (318826) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 16 06:21:03 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 05:44:50 2008. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist.But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. But you understate the importance of Reverend Wright's comments. You must be a racist. I think I got the number of repetitions correct, no? I used to be into S & M, bestiality and necrophilia but I got tired of beating a dead horse. your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (318828) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 06:29:52 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by Fred G on Fri May 16 06:21:03 2008. Heh. Yeah, I have to admit ... I really AM a racist myself ... lemme go put on my BLUE sheets ... OK, here I am ... and yeah, confessing to all, I cannot lie anymore ... Unca Selkook *must* admit ...I FAVOR the HUMAN race! There, I said it, let the bonfire be started. :) |
|
|
| (318829) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 06:53:34 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 06:29:52 2008. OK ... it's official ... I've filed the papers, there is now an OFFICIAL "BIPED POWER!" radical political party ...POWER TO THE BIPEDS!  ALL OTHERS MUST DIE!  Moo. :) |
|
|
| (318831) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri May 16 07:14:39 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 06:53:34 2008. If Falwell was still alive, he'd be on ya for that purple triangle.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (318837) | |
Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?) |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Fri May 16 07:30:21 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses Obama (was Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?), posted by Fred G on Fri May 16 07:14:39 2008. If Falwell t'weren't dead, he'd probably be wearing one of those purple triangles off to meet the comet ... you remember. :) |
|
|
| (318840) | |
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Fri May 16 08:09:36 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Thu May 15 18:11:59 2008. That dollar policy, however, is beyond Congress' control. |
|
|
| (319202) | |
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 17 16:01:17 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by AMoreira81 on Fri May 16 08:09:36 2008. True ... proper taxation to pay for the war as well as bills to end the financial crises were indeed passed by congress and vetoed by the putz in the White House. :( |
|
|
| (319204) | |
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 17 16:09:20 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 17 16:01:17 2008. Not even the Libertarians would agree with that, would they? They say that military funding is one of the federal government's few obligations (the Libertarians don't like regulating interstate commerce or fair trade, though). |
|
|
| (319215) | |
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 17 16:48:41 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 17 16:09:20 2008. Scroo the liberatarians ... even though I'm sure (according to their dogma) that funding for this "war" is a "prime directive" instead of borrowing from the Chinese and the Arabs to fight it. And I just LOVE the fact that we're borrowing from the Arabs to make war on Arabs and then whining all the way home when they won't fill up our hummers. :-\ |
|
|
| (319220) | |
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 17 16:57:16 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 17 16:48:41 2008. I haven't forgotten about this list either. However, the war is supposed to be about ideology instead of ethnicity (most Iranians are Persian and Azeri . . . and of course, they're in the list under "Oil Exporters"). |
|
|
| (319227) | |
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sat May 17 17:14:05 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by Olog-hai on Sat May 17 16:57:16 2008. And we'll borrow our way out of this mess yet, by gum! Wonder how much Iran wants to front us to cover the invasion costs? :) |
|
|
| (320005) | |
Re: Edwards endorses ObamaRe: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue May 20 20:02:32 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses ObamaRe: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by Easy on Thu May 15 00:21:25 2008. WE SUPPORT YOUR WAR OF TERROR! |
|
|
| (320055) | |
Re: Edwards endorses ObamaRe: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 21 03:30:20 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses ObamaRe: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by Easy on Thu May 15 00:38:21 2008. They go out of their way to say "Zionists" instead of "Jews" because if they said the latter then the liberal intellectuals wouldn't be able to side with them. |
|
|
| (320145) | |
Re: Edwards endorses ObamaRe: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed May 21 16:33:11 2008, in response to Re: Edwards endorses ObamaRe: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 21 03:30:20 2008. Correct. |
|
|
|
Page 7 of 7 |
||