National hero

National hero (1473410)	Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3]

Page 1 of 3

Next Page >

(1473410)	view threaded
National hero
Posted by bingbong on Thu Nov 2 23:20:20 2017 Just in from CNN: A customer service employee, on their last day, closed trump's Twitter account. Hard to say if it's real, after all CNN's been shooting from the hip for almost forty years, but, well, in before. Just in case.😋
Post a New Response

(1473413)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Thu Nov 2 23:39:00 2017, in response to National hero, posted by bingbong on Thu Nov 2 23:20:20 2017.* I hope that ex-employee goes to jail
Post a New Response

(1473414)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by FYBklyn1959* on Thu Nov 2 23:39:57 2017, in response to National hero, posted by bingbong on Thu Nov 2 23:20:20 2017.* It's being reported elsewhere. It was actually down for only 11 minutes One of many Human error, right! :) Twitter is investigating. Since it was the employee's last day, not sure what action they could take. I guess to see if it really was inadvertent.
Post a New Response

(1473415)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by Henry R32 #3730* on Thu Nov 2 23:43:00 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu Nov 2 23:39:57 2017.* Even if intentional, not a damn thing anyone can do about it, no matter how much they might want to. If it were a bank or a utility it would be a different story, but there's nothing remotely essential to a twitter account. I disagree with the action, but defend his right to take it :).
Post a New Response

(1473417)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Nov 2 23:57:39 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by BILLBKLYN on Thu Nov 2 23:39:00 2017.* There's a case to put that person away. And certainly this does not look good for future employment prospects.
Post a New Response

(1473419)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Thu Nov 2 23:58:25 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Thu Nov 2 23:43:00 2017.* What right?
Post a New Response

(1473445)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Fri Nov 3 02:55:29 2017, in response to National hero, posted by bingbong on Thu Nov 2 23:20:20 2017.* Typical leftist....twart anything you don't want to hear
Post a New Response

(1473449)	view threaded
Re: Disgruntled Employee
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Nov 3 04:10:00 2017, in response to National hero, posted by bingbong on Thu Nov 2 23:20:20 2017.* Title corrected.
Post a New Response

(1473452)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by Fred G* on Fri Nov 3 05:35:01 2017, in response to National hero, posted by bingbong on Thu Nov 2 23:20:20 2017.* Lol
Post a New Response

(1473479)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 08:42:44 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by Fred G on Fri Nov 3 05:35:01 2017.* Exactly.
Post a New Response

(1473485)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 09:39:18 2017, in response to Re: Disgruntled Employee, posted by Chicagomotorman on Fri Nov 3 04:10:00 2017.* Not for long. Even his own people want him to stop that horseshit.
Post a New Response

(1473491)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Nov 3 10:20:15 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Fri Nov 3 02:55:29 2017.* Yes; they show their disdain for freedom of speech here.
Post a New Response

(1473495)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 10:26:26 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 3 10:20:15 2017.* This guy has no business in thta office. Presidents are supposed to set the way without insulting the citizenry. They are not supposed to be publically hateful, vulgar and uncouth. They are not supposed to divide, which is exactly what every tweet does. We have (note the past tense) historically looked to presidents to be everything we aspire to be. Not this time. He has ruined this country for that alone.
Post a New Response

(1473501)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Fri Nov 3 10:49:44 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 09:39:18 2017.* None the less, once again, we get to proclaim; "WRONG AGAIN BINGBONG". It was a disgruntled employee on their last day. Need I say again, SHUT YOUR FUCKING PIE HOLE.
Post a New Response

(1473503)	view threaded
Re: Disgruntled employee
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Nov 3 10:52:50 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 09:39:18 2017.* No, you're full of shit!
Post a New Response

(1473506)	view threaded
Re: Disgruntled Employee
Posted by Chicagomotorman* on Fri Nov 3 10:53:49 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by Fred G on Fri Nov 3 05:35:01 2017.* Corrected
Post a New Response

(1473511)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Nov 3 11:00:32 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 10:26:26 2017.* This guy has no business in that office Yes; that's why he's gone from Twitter. And Trump is the duly elected POTUS, governing constitutionally unlike that predecessor of his. The left proves its hatred for free speech.
Post a New Response

(1473514)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Spider-Pig* on Fri Nov 3 11:21:24 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 3 11:00:32 2017.* governing constitutionally unlike that predecessor of his.
Post a New Response

(1473549)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 13:41:27 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 3 11:00:32 2017.* President Obama, a natural born citizen, was duly, legally and fully elected twice, with majorities in the Electorals AND popular votes. He HAD a claim to a mandate. Like it or not, trump does NOT. America does not want or need his oppressive horseshit. Yes, he's there, through a legal fluke, however he does NOt reflect the will of the people.
Post a New Response

(1473556)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Fri Nov 3 13:50:39 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 13:41:27 2017.* Or if you are an example, he does not reflect the will of hateful pigs.
Post a New Response

(1473562)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 13:56:38 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 3 13:50:39 2017.* And you talk about calling names. Hater.
Post a New Response

(1473566)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Fri Nov 3 14:01:15 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 13:56:38 2017.* You opened the door again, porky. I warned you.
Post a New Response

(1473584)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 14:45:20 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by R2ChinaTown on Fri Nov 3 14:01:15 2017.* You are the one who makes such a deal about beng called out on your hate, snowflake. You could stop hating yunno. It's always an option.
Post a New Response

(1473600)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by chicagomotorman* on Fri Nov 3 16:01:46 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 14:45:20 2017.* Name calling.
Post a New Response

(1473620)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Fri Nov 3 18:11:11 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 14:45:20 2017.* You can always try to justify being as ugly inside as you are outside but you stink up this place about as badly as you stink up your panties, pig.n
Post a New Response

(1473653)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Fri Nov 3 20:58:32 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 13:41:27 2017.* Trumpis also a natural born citizen, was duly, legally and fully elected. And elected exactly how he's supposed to and how the other Presidents before him.
Post a New Response

(1473659)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Fri Nov 3 21:20:19 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Fri Nov 3 20:58:32 2017.* No, he got into office through a fluke in the Electoral system. He has no mandate, as millions said so through their vote.
Post a New Response

(1473674)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Fri Nov 3 23:12:31 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 21:20:19 2017.* It's no fluke in the electoral system it's exactly how presidential election are done, and have been done.
Post a New Response

(1473675)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by Fisk Ave Jim* on Fri Nov 3 23:20:28 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by bingbong on Fri Nov 3 10:26:26 2017.* "He has ruined this country for that alone. " Thats just hysterical nonsense. This country is far from "ruined" Troubled, yes but a long way from ruined. When you see folks lined up around the block to drop a grand on a phone that will be obeselete in a few months, that is not the produce of a ruined society. With the market going thru the roof & the fat getting fatter, tell them that this country is ruined. When folks start not wanting to come here, then you might be close to having a point. Till then, America is still the place to be. Presidents come & go. Real Americans stay and stay proud.
Post a New Response

(1473677)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Fri Nov 3 23:25:44 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Nov 3 23:20:28 2017.* Wow, what a great post, which sums it up perfectly
Post a New Response

(1473678)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Nov 3 23:25:53 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by Fisk Ave Jim on Fri Nov 3 23:20:28 2017.* My Android cost $30. And most increase in fatness is due to overly processed food anyhow.
Post a New Response

(1473680)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Fri Nov 3 23:31:15 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by Olog-hai on Fri Nov 3 23:25:53 2017.* He's talking about the new iPhone. And you must have a pretty crappy model Android at only $30, as the better ones are a few hundred. That said, $1000 for a new phone is absurd
Post a New Response

(1473682)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by Olog-hai* on Fri Nov 3 23:35:06 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Fri Nov 3 23:31:15 2017.* Nah; it suits me fine. The only thing I use it for besides as a phone is internet radio in the car.
Post a New Response

(1473685)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by R2ChinaTown* on Fri Nov 3 23:59:32 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Fri Nov 3 23:31:15 2017.* My LG K3 was about $60 and is more than adequate for every day use. I'll be damned before I pony up a thousand dollars for a phone.
Post a New Response

(1473693)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Sat Nov 4 02:16:24 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Fri Nov 3 23:12:31 2017.* This is. So few people deciding against the will of millions? No, you can't try to tell anyone that's acceptable.
Post a New Response

(1473695)	view threaded
Re: National hero
Posted by bingbong* on Sat Nov 4 02:19:34 2017, in response to Re: National hero, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Fri Nov 3 23:25:44 2017.* And, sadly superfluously. Shallow views don't help. Gadgets aren't greatess. You can get an iphone anywhere. There will be a record number of expatrations this year. That, IMO, says more.
Post a New Response

(1473698)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sat Nov 4 03:25:26 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 02:16:24 2017.* It's obviously acceptable, because that's the way it's done in United States.
Post a New Response

(1473720)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Sat Nov 4 08:06:24 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 03:25:26 2017.* Somehow I doubt the founders intended the clear loser of the vote to get into office.
Post a New Response

(1473721)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sat Nov 4 08:08:23 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:06:24 2017.* Well, why was the Electoral College formed?
Post a New Response

(1473723)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Sat Nov 4 08:15:39 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:08:23 2017.* Because the south felt they would not get represented as their population was mostly enslaved people.
Post a New Response

(1473724)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by AlM* on Sat Nov 4 08:25:30 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:08:23 2017.* To preserve the institution of slavery. Without the protections it had in the Constitution, slavery would likely have been abolished in the US roughly when it was abolished in the British Empire, in the 1830s.
Post a New Response

(1473725)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sat Nov 4 08:33:30 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:15:39 2017.* Try again! Anyways, it's 2017 and the safeguards are still in place. If the Democrats didn't want Donald Trump to win, they should have had better candidates on their side.
Post a New Response

(1473726)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sat Nov 4 08:34:24 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by AlM on Sat Nov 4 08:25:30 2017.* That may be a small part of it, but not the main reason. Please, don't be like her and try to reinvent history
Post a New Response

(1473727)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by JayZeeBMT* on Sat Nov 4 08:38:44 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:33:30 2017.* I actually agree with you on this. To this day, I'm astonished that the Democrats couldn't find a candidate capable of defeating Donald Trump. That shouldn't have been hard to do at all.
Post a New Response

(1473728)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Sat Nov 4 08:43:09 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:33:30 2017.* Nope. It was because of slavery. Your own delusion doesn't change the facts.
Post a New Response

(1473729)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by bingbong* on Sat Nov 4 08:44:44 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:34:24 2017.* No, it's the only reason. It wasn't changed because no one felt there was a need to. Until this century, you have to admit there really wasn't.
Post a New Response

(1473730)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sat Nov 4 08:45:16 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Nov 4 08:38:44 2017.* And, you can look at it on the other side of the coin. The Republicans only had Donald Trump.
Post a New Response

(1473731)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by BILLBKLYN* on Sat Nov 4 08:45:53 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by bingbong on Sat Nov 4 08:43:09 2017.* I'M the delusional one???
Post a New Response

(1473733)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by gp38/r42 chris* on Sat Nov 4 08:57:12 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by JayZeeBMT on Sat Nov 4 08:38:44 2017.* And the problem is, they aren't even attempting to get better ones in place. Instead they are on their current rampage. The Republicans didn't have great options either....but look who the Democrats lost to...that says more about the Democrats than trump. They need to get their asses in gear, and instead are doubling down on what failed. I'm serious here. I WANT them to have a strong candidate that appeals to masses, not just the far left. The same can be said of the Republicans in reverse.
Post a New Response

(1473734)	view threaded
Re: National hero?
Posted by AlM* on Sat Nov 4 08:57:15 2017, in response to Re: National hero?, posted by BILLBKLYN on Sat Nov 4 08:34:24 2017.* It's part of a whole package of features designed to get the South to agree to join with the North into a single country.
Post a New Response

[1 2 3]
	Page 1 of 3	Next Page >

[ Return to the Message Index ]