|
|
| Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? (1269616) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||
|
| (1270432) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:25:50 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:25:18 2015. Sorry for the double post. |
|
|
| (1270433) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Mar 5 14:27:09 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:13:41 2015. Those are public figures.In general, it seems women who are staunch supporters of the Democrat party have issues. Issues with men Issues with pretty women Issues with their father Issues with their self-image |
|
|
| (1270448) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by mcorivervsaf on Thu Mar 5 15:37:24 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:13:41 2015. Wow... and ouch!LOL! |
|
|
| (1270449) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Charles G on Thu Mar 5 15:40:35 2015, in response to Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by AlM on Thu Mar 5 11:59:02 2015. Seriously? You buy that as an excuse?She was the Secretary of State for the world's largest superpower. And she ran the entire show using her own personal email address. Quite possibly so that nobody would ever see her emails. I find it particularly galling that she has called on the State Department to release her emails. How can they do that??? She is only one who has all of them! Here is the statement from the State Department (emphasis added) -- "The State Department will review for public release the emails provided by Secretary Clinton to the Department, using a normal process that guides such releases," That isn't releasing your emails, that's releasing the emails that you want to release. |
|
|
| (1270451) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Thu Mar 5 15:47:56 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Charles G on Thu Mar 5 15:40:35 2015. I buy what as an excuse for what? |
|
|
| (1270457) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Thu Mar 5 16:28:28 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:25:18 2015. Looks familiar. Aryans on the top and Jews on the bottom.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1270460) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Charles G on Thu Mar 5 16:29:29 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by AlM on Thu Mar 5 15:47:56 2015. You say that her "irresponsible" actions are unlikely to impact her candidacy because of the the "skeletons" that article cited. I assume that because you posted the article and made the statement, you accept that becauseHer actions as Secretary of State may very well have put national security at risk through the exclusive use of an unprotected email system. There has been no explanation offered as to why she would do such a thing. The possibility remains that she did this only for the purpose of keeping her emails out of the public domain in the event of a future run for presidency -- that is, she put national security at risk in the furtherance of her own political ambitions. That trumps anything in the article by a factor of 10,000. Simple questions for which answers should be readily available but have not yet been provided -- 1. Why did she create a personal email domain and use it exclusively for her government business? 2. Why did the administration allow this practice? 3. Are there others in the administration who also follow (or followed) this practice? |
|
|
| (1270463) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Thu Mar 5 16:32:27 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:25:18 2015. Schlussel is Jewish.Not sure what Ingraham was before converting to Catholicism. |
|
|
| (1270468) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu Mar 5 16:36:22 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:25:18 2015. I agree Babs is not much to look at now, but she looked damn good in a towel in What's up Doc! :) |
|
|
| (1270469) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu Mar 5 16:38:52 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by FYBklyn1959 on Thu Mar 5 16:36:22 2015. Another pic. Nice body, even if her face was meh |
|
|
| (1270482) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Thu Mar 5 18:15:32 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:13:41 2015. Putting Mann Coulter ruined that. |
|
|
| (1270484) | |
Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 5 18:38:29 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:13:41 2015. How come Debbie Wasserman-Schultz wasn't on that graphic? |
|
|
| (1270548) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 6 10:22:24 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Dave on Thu Mar 5 14:25:18 2015. I thought that looked familiar...  
 #justnazithingsattheGOP your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1270553) | |
Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Fri Mar 6 10:54:04 2015, in response to Re: Oops Re: E-mail gate?, posted by Fred G on Fri Mar 6 10:22:24 2015. Now, now. Godwin wins again. :)PS. That old German font really is a pain. |
|
|
| (1271415) | |
Obama E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 10 14:31:39 2015, in response to E-mail gate?, posted by Charles G on Tue Mar 3 07:57:51 2015. Associated PressHe still uses a BlackBerry? |
|
|
| (1271419) | |
Re: Obama E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by Fred G on Tue Mar 10 14:42:09 2015, in response to Obama E-mail gate?, posted by Olog-hai on Tue Mar 10 14:31:39 2015. rightly or wrongly so, the secret service feels it's more secure than iPhone.your pal, Fred |
|
|
| (1271444) | |
Re: Obama E-mail gate? |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Mar 10 15:19:31 2015, in response to Re: Obama E-mail gate?, posted by Fred G on Tue Mar 10 14:42:09 2015. In addition, Obama's BB has been beefed up with all kinds of safeguards and security features by instructors from the Secret Service's Technical Services section. |
|
|
[1 2] |
||
|
Page 2 of 2 |
||