|
|
| Send in the Army to fight Ebola? Lulz! (1233545) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1233545) | |
Send in the Army to fight Ebola? Lulz! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 14 03:28:33 2014 The consequences of republican rule of budget and tax cuts continue to mount. Can't fight Ebola here, can't fight it over there. Prepare to die then given what you're being sold. I'm sure those you believe in are already well stocked and ready for the zombie apocalypse. You? Well too bad. Keep voting to cut your own balls off because your "friends" don't care. Never did. Enjoy that tax cut, and don't get sick ...http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/10/13/us-usa-military-army-idUSKCN0I21V620141013?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews Our righties won't bother to read it, so be surprised then. |
|
|
| (1233558) | |
Re: Send in the Army to fight Ebola? Lulz! |
|
|
Posted by WillD on Tue Oct 14 07:17:32 2014, in response to Send in the Army to fight Ebola? Lulz!, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 14 03:28:33 2014. It's rather amusing to hear these dire pronouncements from the federal department which receives more than 50% of the nation's discretionary funding. Given all the money we pour into the DOD we should be able to expect the world from them, but we get virtually no value for our money. They're going to have to learn to work with less funding if this country is to survive. |
|
|
| (1233563) | |
Re: Send in the Army to fight Ebola? Lulz! |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Oct 14 07:29:00 2014, in response to Re: Send in the Army to fight Ebola? Lulz!, posted by WillD on Tue Oct 14 07:17:32 2014. Or even better, if some of our "allies" stopped expecting US to carry the weight for them after they pissed off the wrong people. Being the "world's cop" costs serious money. Maybe we should start sending out bills since Americans are no longer willing to pay for it. After all, tax cuts are more important than any of that. |
|
|