|
|
| Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused (1215306) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 2 of 4 |
||
|
| (1215453) | |
Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:57:22 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 19:16:24 2014. "Obviously that doesn't include ou.Hey idiot, when are you going to learn to use spell check? |
|
|
| (1215455) | |
Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 18 23:05:11 2014, in response to Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:53:19 2014. And a hypocrite too. :)Perhaps I was wrong about you OR perhaps you just had nothing to refute my point with so you did what every under-equipped liberal will do - attack spelling or grammar. Dan Lawrence outscores you again! |
|
|
| (1215456) | |
Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 18 23:07:59 2014, in response to Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:57:22 2014. Librul!Perhaps I was wrong about you OR perhaps you just had nothing to refute my point with so you did what every under-equipped liberal will do - attack spelling or grammar. |
|
|
| (1215464) | |
Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:29:21 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 18 23:05:11 2014. So once again you are intimating that your friend, Dan Lawrence is stupid but I am less intelligent. Is that really what you think of dan lawrence. By the way, bingbang is a dim bulb regardless of how many mistakes I make. |
|
|
| (1215466) | |
Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:36:45 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Aug 18 23:07:59 2014. Before you make an ass of yourself again, perhaps you need to back-track in the thread. Of course you have turned making an ass of yourself into an art form. |
|
|
| (1215503) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 19 06:39:08 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:38:55 2014. Depending on the situation, it can be. |
|
|
| (1215504) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 19 06:42:28 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 16:37:48 2014. I don't understand one thing....WHY sick up for a felon who just did a strong-arm robbery? And PLEASE don't bring race into this, as it has NOTHING to do with this. If a white guy robbed a store, scuffled with police, and then got shot and killed, I would be like "Oh well! He gets what he deserved!" Everyone should STOP trying to make a Martyr out of a punk. JMHO.... |
|
|
| (1215506) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Aug 19 07:14:42 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 19 06:42:28 2014. not really a shooting of a unarmed innocent person is still murder by police / sheriffs |
|
|
| (1215512) | |
Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:32:23 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:36:45 2014. Where does calling YOU on a hypocrisy makes him the asshole? |
|
|
| (1215516) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:36:02 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:50:03 2014. Only ONE said he was shot in the back. The rest stated he was shot head on , and fatally once he had put his hands up and head down. The shot through his skull is what killed him. |
|
|
| (1215517) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Aug 19 07:36:31 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:36:02 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1215518) | |
Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:38:12 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:29:21 2014. No, I think YOU are less intelligent. I'm just fine. So is Selkirk and BTW Dan Lawrence. |
|
|
| (1215519) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 07:43:05 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:36:02 2014. among all of your other areas of expert knowledge are you also a medical examiner? |
|
|
| (1215520) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:44:45 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 22:54:33 2014. Only ONE witness went on about being shot in the back. There are over a dozen witnesses in total. You ought to pay attention to every piece of information, the RW echo chamber is running with very little of it.So far, it's not looking so good for your innocent cop bullshit. There is still missing evidence. Without that, this cop is going to hang for this. |
|
|
| (1215524) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:08:28 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Mon Aug 18 14:32:22 2014. Thank you for confirming my initial thoughts. Salaam obviously is not an honest debater. |
|
|
| (1215525) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:09:17 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 16:57:41 2014. No one said otherwise. |
|
|
| (1215526) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:10:03 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Mon Aug 18 17:26:51 2014. LOL!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| (1215527) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 08:11:04 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 07:43:05 2014. No, but I read about the autopsyreport last night while I stayed in a Holiday Inn. |
|
|
| (1215528) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:11:57 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:20:49 2014. You're clueless. |
|
|
| (1215529) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:13:04 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 07:43:05 2014. +6667890.2 |
|
|
| (1215530) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:13:27 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 08:11:04 2014. Stay classy! |
|
|
| (1215532) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:14:20 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by LuchAAA on Mon Aug 18 17:23:01 2014. W00t f0r y0u |
|
|
| (1215533) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:14:54 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 17:51:46 2014. IAWTP |
|
|
| (1215534) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:15:08 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Mon Aug 18 17:38:55 2014. Wrong. |
|
|
| (1215535) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:15:56 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Tue Aug 19 07:14:42 2014. No, not necessarily. |
|
|
| (1215536) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:16:31 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by AlM on Mon Aug 18 14:41:38 2014. Thank you. |
|
|
| (1215540) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 08:22:26 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Allan on Mon Aug 18 15:55:36 2014. IINM only Salaam has drawn a conclusion. |
|
|
| (1215546) | |
Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 19 08:33:26 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:29:21 2014. So that's how you parse words after being Dan's biggest booster here? Lulz. How do you remember to breathe? :-\ |
|
|
| (1215553) | |
Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 19 08:41:26 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:36:45 2014. Yep ... must be me that's doing that whole ass thing. Heh. |
|
|
| (1215564) | |
Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Tue Aug 19 09:13:53 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong proves herself stupid again was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 19 08:33:26 2014. " How do you remember to breathe? :-\ "LOL...1st he has to "remove" that rubber tire around his body :) |
|
|
| (1215566) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Aug 19 09:17:26 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 07:44:45 2014. Missing evidence...you mean the dozen witnesses who say Brown came at the cop? |
|
|
| (1215570) | |
Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by streetcarman1 on Tue Aug 19 09:20:49 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Train Dude on Mon Aug 18 23:36:45 2014. "Of course you have turned making an ass of yourself into an art form."Oh..ok...so you studied ass as an art form in High School.....what grades to you acquire there? |
|
|
| (1215580) | |
Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Tue Aug 19 09:38:37 2014, in response to Re: Bingbong Careless again Was: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by streetcarman1 on Tue Aug 19 09:20:49 2014. Comes here daily, makes total ass of himself each time, gets pwned and accuses others of making asses of themselves. Ya just can't make this shit up! :) |
|
|
| (1215603) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 10:43:58 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by BILLBKLYN on Tue Aug 19 06:42:28 2014. Stealing a pack of cigars is a felony? They run several bucks, I doubt that's a felony anything in any jurisdiction.Then again, consider that the charge the cop was pursuing was jaywalking. He did not know about the convenience store at the time. It's excessive force at minimum. |
|
|
| (1215604) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Tue Aug 19 10:44:20 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 10:43:58 2014. Eric Holder is going to Ferguson. |
|
|
| (1215605) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 10:44:37 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 10:43:58 2014. ROBBERY is a felony. |
|
|
| (1215606) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 10:47:47 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Dave on Tue Aug 19 09:17:26 2014. Did he? They also said he had his hands up and shouted that he did not have a gun. |
|
|
| (1215611) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:19:19 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 10:47:47 2014. And we should take his word that he did not have a gun? All it takes is a split second for the cop to lower his weapon and Brown to come out with a loaded sidearm and shoot the cop |
|
|
| (1215612) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:21:38 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 10:43:58 2014. According to New York Penal Law §160.05A person is guilty of robbery in the third degree when he forcibly steals property. Robbery 3 is a D Felony in New York. The property value could be de minimis but you use force it is a Felony |
|
|
| (1215613) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 11:25:55 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:19:19 2014. Obvious Post |
|
|
| (1215615) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 11:27:42 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:21:38 2014. Nice, but I looked at the relevant Missouri statute before any posts where I claimed there was a robbery:Chapter 569 Robbery, Arson, Burglary and Related Offenses Section 569.030 August 28, 2013 Robbery in the second degree. 569.030. 1. A person commits the crime of robbery in the second degree when he forcibly steals property. 2. Robbery in the second degree is a class B felony. |
|
|
| (1215616) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:29:21 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 11:27:42 2014. thanks for posting the Missouri statutebingbong posted that it was not a felony anywhere so I figured any jurisdiction would be sufficient to prove her wrong |
|
|
| (1215617) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 11:38:26 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:29:21 2014. Note that she doesn't disagree that robbery is a felony, she seems to disagree that it was a robbery: "Stealing a pack of cigars is a felony? They run several bucks, I doubt that's a felony anything in any jurisdiction."No mention of the other element of robbery. |
|
|
| (1215618) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:48:05 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 11:38:26 2014. I interpreted it as saying that in the world according to bingbong, where abortions are mandatory to every female under the age of 17 who gets pregnant, even if there is force there is a value threshold to what can be considered Robbery and thus a felony |
|
|
| (1215630) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 12:00:12 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 11:48:05 2014. Wow do you ever have it all wrong. |
|
|
| (1215635) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 12:13:10 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 12:00:12 2014. If I misinterpreted what you wrote when you posted "Stealing a pack of cigars is a felony? They run several bucks, I doubt that's a felony anything in any jurisdiction" feel to post where I made the mistake. I am not saying I am never incorrect because there have been times that other members have pointed out errors I have made, but don't just say I am wrong without explaining in what way I am wrong |
|
|
| (1215639) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 12:15:06 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by mtk52983 on Tue Aug 19 12:13:10 2014. Laws change. Used to be charges varied on the value of stolen goods. |
|
|
| (1215649) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Aug 19 12:28:54 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 11:25:55 2014. Nothing is obvious to Officer bingbong, who knows more about police procedure (and medicine, and law, and....) then anyone. |
|
|
| (1215650) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by Dave on Tue Aug 19 12:30:13 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 19 10:44:37 2014. Brown's crime was a misdemeanor in Missouri since the value of what was stolen was less than $500. |
|
|
| (1215657) | |
Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Aug 19 12:51:23 2014, in response to Re: Eye Witnesses May Have Been Confused, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 19 12:15:06 2014. 1. So what does he have all wrong?2. What does the fact that laws change have to do with this discussion? 3. Were you or were you not wrong when you claimed that stealing cigars is not a felony anywhere? |
|
|
|
Page 2 of 4 |
||