Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 4

 

(1190333)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 08:47:56 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Dave on Mon Jun 2 06:23:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well, when it comes to polls driven news, no. Far too often their polls are weighted to show their desired result.

There are better sources for investment information. Much better.

Post a New Response

(1190334)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jun 2 08:48:33 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 08:47:56 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
How about posting a poll of your own?

Post a New Response

(1190344)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 09:48:20 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Nilet on Sun Jun 1 23:51:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And you're a left wing nut.

Post a New Response

(1190347)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 09:51:57 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by bingbong on Sun Jun 1 20:50:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Please, instead of trying to fault my proof, why don't you post proof of your own? Instead of the anecdotal bullshit that you give when you are proven wrong, why don't you just link to a credible source that proves me wrong. Of course you are only too willing to do this when you find such a source so the answer must be that, "you can't"!

Post a New Response

(1190348)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki “Resigns”

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 2 09:52:46 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 09:51:57 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I wonder if they think films like Fahrenheit 9/11 or Blackfish are actual documentaries, still.

Post a New Response

(1190349)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki “Resigns”

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 2 09:53:30 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Dave on Mon Jun 2 06:23:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. Wonder if it'll be Thinkprogress or Media Matters.

Post a New Response

(1190352)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 09:59:16 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 09:51:57 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Um...it's right there. Read the NEWER Forbes article. It's even YOUR RW source.

Post a New Response

(1190353)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 2 10:00:20 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 09:48:20 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You did read this already, didn't you?



Post a New Response

(1190354)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:00:49 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by bingbong on Sun Jun 1 23:46:49 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ah so big bung cannot provide any proof so she just doubles down on her bullshit. So she doesn't like Forbes? Why doesn't she post an article from a credible source that supports her bullshit position.

Post a New Response

(1190356)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:01:36 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 09:48:20 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Oh? Which positions do I hold that you think are "nutty?"

Post a New Response

(1190358)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 10:01:45 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 2 10:00:20 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Nilet is baffled.

Post a New Response

(1190360)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:03:06 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:00:49 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You can't deal with the fact that our own sources turned on you, canya?

Post a New Response

(1190361)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki “Resigns”

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 10:03:10 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki “Resigns”, posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 2 09:53:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I suppose theose are reliable sources.

Post a New Response

(1190362)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 10:03:42 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:03:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Is canya a word?

Post a New Response

(1190363)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:04:08 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 10:03:42 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It is now.

Post a New Response

(1190364)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:05:18 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by ChicagoMotorman on Mon Jun 2 10:01:45 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Perhaps you need to read this. Assuming you don't support apartheid yourself, of course.

Olog: Please note the use of links to highlight other posts, without the need for obnoxious iframes.

Post a New Response

(1190365)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:06:29 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 09:59:16 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
How can you claim Forbes is not a valid source and then try to use it? Let me explain it to you. You are a hypocrite but all that aside, the article that you posted was one person's opinion. It shows what one person thinks. It contains no data to prove anything except that one 3rd world doctor likes ACA. I hate to call "BULLSHIT" but it is another bingbung failure.

Post a New Response

(1190367)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:07:01 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Olog-hai on Mon Jun 2 10:00:20 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
OK, back to basics.

Define "liberal."

Define "conservative."

Or shut up.

By the way, since you keep using those words while refusing to learn what they mean, I actually have that response in a little box next to the post field so that I can copy/paste it when necessary.

Post a New Response

(1190368)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:07:41 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:03:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If you post facts or data I'll deal with them. So far you've shown us nothing.

Post a New Response

(1190372)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:10:44 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:06:29 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
How can you claim Forbes is not a valid source and then try to use it?

Let me explain it to you. Forbes has a right-wing agenda, meaning they distort the facts to support right-wing policies. That the facts support the centrist position so completely that even a right-wing source has to accept them proves the bankruptcy of the right-wing position more than if a reliable source said it.

There's nothing hypocritical about saying "my position is so obviously right that even your people accept it."

Post a New Response

(1190375)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:14:56 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:10:44 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Epic Fail !!!

Keep trying, though!

Post a New Response

(1190378)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:21:00 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:06:29 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I used the Forbes article because YOU think it's valid, so YOU will have to acquiesce to YOUR source showing support of ACA.

The other article was just an additional source.

Post a New Response

(1190379)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:22:30 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:07:41 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Plenty of "fact" in the Forbes article. But that's ok, just keep denying your own source disagrees with our delusion.

Post a New Response

(1190381)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:25:06 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:14:56 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
First this and now your current post...

...you have trouble understanding things, don't you? Since you're a right-winger, it's probably because you're practicing crimestop and shutting down your brain right before any unauthorised thought.

Because I'm really not sure how to explain this any more succinctly than I already did here.

Post a New Response

(1190384)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:25:48 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:21:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lets try again. The bullshit that you are trying to pass off as proof is nothing but an op-ed piece by one 3rd world Dr. It has no data or provides no proof to support his conclusions. It is, therefore, just bullshit.

Now I am heading for the gym and then to lunch and this evening I'll be at Yankee Stadium. Do you think by the time I get back, you might be able to find something that vaguely resembles verifiable proof of your position? After all, what else do you have to do in your life, today?

Post a New Response

(1190385)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:27:41 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:25:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Don't waste your time you smug little shit.

Post a New Response

(1190386)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:27:53 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:25:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ou are not getting it. There were two articles listed in my post. The first one IS A FORBES ARTICLE FROM 2013. THAT is what I'm talking about.

I could give a damn about your day.

Post a New Response

(1190387)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Dave on Mon Jun 2 10:28:13 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jun 2 08:48:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Don't hold your breath waiting.

Post a New Response

(1190389)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:31:05 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:27:53 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
So I guess you won't be posting any real proof then. I'll accept that as your white flag. then

Post a New Response

(1190392)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:40:54 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:27:41 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ah, thanks for admitting it. I can't say I particularly like it, but at least it's refreshing when a right-winger is willing to simply admit that he's unwilling or unable to understand a rational argument or explanation.

Post a New Response

(1190393)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:43:18 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 08:47:56 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Far too often their polls are weighted to show their desired result.

Don't ask me to dig up the specific link, but I'm pretty sure polls have shown that "the Affordable Care Act" is considerably more popular than "Obamacare."

Post a New Response

(1190395)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki Resigns

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:43:58 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki Resigns, posted by Train Dude on Mon Jun 2 10:31:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Ypu already got all th eproof you need from the Forbes article I linked to.

Post a New Response

(1190400)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:53:57 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:43:18 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
At this point, to quote Sec Clinton "what difference does it make?"

I found an article from his preferred our e, Forbes, that's yer newer than the antique he's running with showing growing support for ACA.

That he can't deal with that has been made more glaringly obvious since. Now he claims he has to go out all day and night, obviously to avoid further embarrassment. LOL!

Post a New Response

(1190416)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jun 2 12:31:14 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jun 2 08:48:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
IAWTP

Post a New Response

(1190461)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jun 2 16:18:24 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:43:18 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah, saw that too ... stupid republicans. :)

Post a New Response

(1190462)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jun 2 16:19:17 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jun 2 08:48:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Looks like we have three volunteers. :)

Given what I see of the subchat averages, it'll make Dave happy.

Post a New Response

(1190469)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Mon Jun 2 16:39:52 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by Nilet on Mon Jun 2 10:05:18 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It's been a while since he's last done the iframe thing. That's an indication that his jimmies are EXTRA rustled. :)

Post a New Response

(1190480)

view threaded

Re: Shinseki ''Resigns''

Posted by train dude on Mon Jun 2 17:31:28 2014, in response to Re: Shinseki ''Resigns'', posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 2 10:53:57 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Thats what I'd expect a no life douche bag to say. Right now we're at Stans having a great time. You ought to try it some time.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4]

< Previous Page  

Page 4 of 4

 

[ Return to the Message Index ]