Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] >> : Last

 

Page 1 of 13

Next Page >  

(1168835)

view threaded

North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 17:36:24 2014

fiogf49gjkf0d
WRAL, CBS 5, Raleigh

State elections officials seek tighter security

By Laura Leslie
April 2, 2014 2:06 p.m.
State elections officials said Wednesday that they're investigating hundreds of cases of voters who appear to have voted in two states and several dozen who appear to have voted after their deaths.

State lawmakers last year mandated the State Board of Elections to enter into an "Interstate Crosscheck" — a compact of 28 states that agreed to check their voter registration records against those of other states. The program is run by a Kansas consortium, checking 101 million voter records. The largest states — CA, FL, NY, and TX — are not part of the consortium.

State Board of Elections Executive Director Kim Westbrook Strach delivered the report Wednesday to the legislative Elections Oversight committee.

Strach said North Carolina's check found 765 registered North Carolina voters who appear to match registered voters in other states on their first names, last names, dates of birth and the final four digits of their Social Security numbers. Those voters appear to have voted in North Carolina in 2012 and also voted in another state in 2012.

"Now we have to look individually at each one," Strach said. "Could there have been data error?"

The crosscheck also found 35,570 voters in North Carolina who voted in 2012 whose first names, last names and dates of birth match those of voters who voted in other states in 2012, but whose Social Security numbers were not matched.

"A lot of states don't provide last four SSN, or they don't have that information," Strach explained.

Additionally, the analysis found 155,692 registered North Carolina voters whose first and last names, dates of birth and final four Social Security number digits match voters registered in other states but who most recently registered or voted elsewhere.

That last group, Strach said, was most likely voters who moved out of state without notifying their local boards of elections. "Those may be votes we need to remove because they've left North Carolina."

Strach also said a "10-year death audit" found 13,416 deceased voters who had not been removed from voter rolls as of October 2013. Eighty-one of those individuals, she said, died before an election in which they are recorded as having voted.

Strach cautioned that about 30 of those 81 voters appear to have legally cast their votes early via absentee ballot and then died before Election Day.

However, she said, "There are between 40 and 50 [voters] who had died at a time that that's not possible."

"We're in the process of looking at each of these to see," Strach said. "That means either a poll or precinct worker made a mistake and marked the wrong person, or someone voted for them. That's something we can't determine until we look into each case."

Strach's agency is asking legislators for a few key changes they say will improve voter security.

First, the elections board is asking for permission to compile a secure database of digital photographs and electronic signatures that would be available to county elections workers through the state's secure electronic poll book system.

Only 38 counties use that state system, said elections board analyst Marc Burris, while 53 counties still rely on paper election rolls. Counties would have to pay for the hardware in each precinct. But Burris says it would allow workers to check immediately for duplicate voting.

The board is proposing to use state Division of Motor Vehicles photos where possible but is also seeking permission to start a pilot program to take digital photos of voters at voting sites. Those photos would be stored securely and would allow poll workers to use biometrics or facial recognition systems to verify voters' identity.

Burris couldn't immediately say how many cases of duplicate voting are reported in the state. He said the current system, in theory, would block one person from obtaining two ballots. Where there have been cases of duplicate voting, Burris said, "It's more typical that an absentee vote is filed and an Election Day vote is filed."

"I think the big bombshell today is that you have documented voter fraud that has occurred," said Rep. Tim Moore, R-Cleveland. "We have over 36,000 people who apparently voted in this state illegally and committed felonies."

"Are these coming from particular counties?" Moore asked. "Do you have their names and addresses? Is that public information?"

Strach said it is not public information. "We're treating it as a potential criminal investigation until we discern otherwise."

"Could it be voter fraud? Sure, it could be voter fraud," Strach said. "Could it be an error on the part of a precinct person choosing the wrong person's name in the first place? It could be. We're looking at each of these individual cases."

Republican committee members seized on the report as proof that voter fraud is common. Moore asked how many cases happened during early voting, but Strach didn't have that data.

"This is proof positive that voter fraud has in fact occurred," Moore said. "For years, all of us have known anecdotally of different types of voter fraud."

"We have the 'Walking Dead,' and now we've got the 'Voting Dead,'" said Sen. Bob Rucho, R-Mecklenburg. "I guess the reason there's no proof of voter fraud is because we weren't looking for it."

Asked by Rucho to confirm that 50 dead people had voted, Strach declined.

"I do want to stress that the reason could be precinct error," she said.

Asked if her agency had sent any cases to local law enforcement, she said it had, but none had so far been prosecuted.

Sen. Angela Bryant, D-Nash, pointed out that the current changes in voting laws and the requirement for voters to present photo identification at the polls will not stop anyone from voting in two states.

Moore said he believes at least 36,000 people committed voter fraud in 2012.

"I would say, if you've got a first name, a last name and a date of birth, you've got the same person. What are the odds of that?" he said, adding that the numbers would be higher if the largest states were part of the compact.

"It is just as much voter suppression if votes are being cast fraudulently or illegally in this state as vote not being cast, because it is resulting in a result that does not reflect the will of the electorate," he said.

House Speaker Thom Tillis and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger said in a joint statement that the data shows the need for the voting changes that lawmakers approved last year.

“While we are alarmed to hear evidence of widespread voter error and fraud, we are encouraged to see the common-sense law passed to ensure voters are who they say they are is working,” Tillis and Berger said in the statement. “These findings should put to rest ill-informed claims that problems don’t exist and help restore the integrity of our elections process.”

Post a New Response

(1168844)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 2 18:12:36 2014, in response to North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 17:36:24 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
How naive are you to believe an agency of the right-wing NC government? And besides, they have not concluded that there is voter fraud - just similarity in names, etc. As they themselves say, it could be data error. Stay tuned. In other states, similar "fraud" has disappeared upon examination.

Post a New Response

(1168845)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 2 18:24:48 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 2 18:12:36 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Let me guess, you are against photo IDs for voting.

Post a New Response

(1168846)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by WillD on Wed Apr 2 18:55:14 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 2 18:24:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And you're in favor of voter suppression?

Post a New Response

(1168848)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by RockParkMan on Wed Apr 2 19:05:31 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by WillD on Wed Apr 2 18:55:14 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
of course, All Nazis support voter suppression.

Post a New Response

(1168850)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by RockParkMan on Wed Apr 2 19:10:06 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by italianstallion on Wed Apr 2 18:12:36 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Olog is an ally of the freedom destroying CIA, NSA and DOD Break their morale, Walk Pollard.

Post a New Response

(1168853)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:27:42 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by WillD on Wed Apr 2 18:55:14 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course not. Now what is so wrong with requiring a photo ID to vote? If it's a financial hardship, then it should providing for those at no charge.

Post a New Response

(1168854)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Apr 2 19:35:00 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:27:42 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Photo ID currently amounts to a poll tax.

Post a New Response

(1168857)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:40:01 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Wed Apr 2 19:35:00 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No it does not. How so, if hardship cases would be provided at no charge. Are photo IDs required for Israeli elections?

Post a New Response

(1168859)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 2 19:45:55 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:40:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Photo IDs are not mandatory in the US. They are mandatory in Israel.

Post a New Response

(1168860)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 19:49:15 2014, in response to North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 17:36:24 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What's completely unclear is whether or not these supposedly suspect people actually voted, where they voted, and whether or not they are actually the same person. This is totally specious.

Post a New Response

(1168861)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 19:52:01 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 2 18:24:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Sort that shit out when registering if one must. Election day is too busy and the available workers have enough to do without being the ID police.

Post a New Response

(1168862)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:56:11 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 19:52:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Liquor store clerks are too busy being cops to check IDs.

Post a New Response

(1168863)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:05:52 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 19:49:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
The same person? Same name, ss#, and birthday? You have a better chance at winning the lottery than having all those people have the same info as another person.

Post a New Response

(1168864)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:11:58 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 19:52:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah the old 85 year old woman....with the huge bifocal prescription glasses that can hardly hear, working for the little bit the board of election gives them will determine if your scribbled signature is really you or not instead

Post a New Response

(1168865)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:13:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:56:11 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Lol....exactly.

Post a New Response

(1168866)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 2 20:14:28 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:11:58 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
She probably won't be able to see a 2x2 photo either.

your pal,
Fred

Post a New Response

(1168868)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:17:24 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 2 20:14:28 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Better than having her be scribbling handwriting analyst.

Post a New Response

(1168870)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:27:30 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:40:01 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Hate to break it, but we're not Israel.

Post a New Response

(1168871)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:29:31 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Fred G on Wed Apr 2 20:14:28 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's OK ... give our republican friends a little more time and they'll convince their fold that the only way to vote safely is with a mark on the hand or forehead just like in the good book. :)

Post a New Response

(1168872)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Wed Apr 2 20:32:10 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:27:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL

Post a New Response

(1168876)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Apr 2 21:00:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:27:42 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Now what is so wrong with requiring a photo ID to vote?

For one, the article says "the requirement for voters to present photo identification at the polls will not stop anyone from voting in two states."

Post a New Response

(1168878)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 2 21:00:43 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:27:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No kidding.

Post a New Response

(1168879)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Apr 2 21:06:03 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed Apr 2 21:00:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
PWN3D!

Post a New Response

(1168880)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by chicagomotorman on Wed Apr 2 21:10:36 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 20:27:30 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No kidding.

Post a New Response

(1168883)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:18:33 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by ChicagoMotorman on Wed Apr 2 19:56:11 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Liquor store clerks aren't trying to process hundreds of people through in minutes. Plus they have alicense to wath out for.

Post a New Response

(1168885)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:20:24 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:05:52 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
If you read the article they stated they do not have SSNs for most. Nor should they have any. It's not an ID outside of tax/finance issues.

Post a New Response

(1168886)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:21:41 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:18:33 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL, so it's better if the election board people just let it go instead, as they don't have a license to watch out for. LMAO.

Post a New Response

(1168887)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:22:12 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by gp38/r42 chris on Wed Apr 2 20:11:58 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I don't know where ou vote but I've never seen her. Most election workers are women who took early retirement, and are in their mid fifties. They see just fine.

Post a New Response

(1168888)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:22:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:20:24 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
It said last four digits. You know DAMN well what I meant.

Post a New Response

(1168889)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:22:59 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:22:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
And even so....all those people with the exact same name and birthday too? Really.

Post a New Response

(1168890)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:24:05 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:21:41 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
No,they do an excellent job with what they do. But don't press them for more. You show ID when ou register. Then, when time exists to resolve any identity issues, is when that should be done. Not election day.

Post a New Response

(1168891)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:24:05 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:22:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Most election workers are women who took early retirement, and are in their mid fifties. They see just fine.


You have proof of that? And yes, you know damn well I didn't mean "85" literally.

Post a New Response

(1168893)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:24:57 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:24:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Of course that all means nothing if you aren't the one showing up on election day after doing that years earlier.

Post a New Response

(1168895)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 21:26:48 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:24:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Frankly, I wonder why I bothered being an election inspector all those times. If someone wants to challenge a voter, all they have to do is come to us and say "yo" and we'll wrestle the bastard to the ground and demand ID before we load them into the car.

Meanwhile, these republitards fully endorse voter suppression like this. Well ... I say GOOD! If I smell a republican at the polls here in November, they go for a ride instead of to the booth. :)

Post a New Response

(1168896)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:28:06 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 21:26:48 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I already determined that you and bingbong are actually Republicans that are trying to make Democrats look bad.

Post a New Response

(1168898)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:29:37 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:28:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
LOL!!!! Not happening. We're both neither and intend to stay that way.

Post a New Response

(1168900)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Apr 2 21:31:09 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:24:57 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
I know very few dead people who actually complain about democramps using their identity to vote more than once.

Post a New Response

(1168901)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:31:15 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:24:05 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
What, you want photos? They're not allowed.

Post a New Response

(1168903)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 21:31:27 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:28:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Heh. We're WORSE than that ... we're Harpo Marxists. :)

Post a New Response

(1168905)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:32:04 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:29:37 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Well either way, you surely are making Democrats look bad!

Post a New Response

(1168907)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:33:18 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:31:15 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
There's got to be some demographic info, as where else would you know who all NY election workers are?

Post a New Response

(1168909)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:35:04 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:32:04 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's your delusion, despite the reality of the republicans being much much worse for all Americans. They certainly look that way.

Are you in favor of letting Americans starve?

Post a New Response

(1168910)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:36:25 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:35:04 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d

Are you in favor of letting Americans starve?

LOL. Please. I am not playing the game.

Post a New Response

(1168911)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 21:36:33 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:28:06 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Not necessary when they have Pelosi, Biden, Kerry, Reid, Schumer and so many others to do that instead. (Not even the POTUS is so needed, as bad as he is.)

Post a New Response

(1168912)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 21:37:43 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Apr 2 21:36:25 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Yeah . . . instant "fail" when they pull that BS. Government is not a factor, unless of course you want people to starve (then their interference foments starvation).

Post a New Response

(1168913)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 21:43:27 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 21:37:43 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d

Post a New Response

(1168917)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by Train Dude on Wed Apr 2 22:14:51 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 21:22:12 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
"Most election workers are women who took early retirement, and are in their mid fifties."

>

Post a New Response

(1168921)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Apr 2 22:28:04 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Train Dude on Wed Apr 2 22:14:51 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
Doesn't even know where we live, but knows what our local board of election workers look like. LOL!

Another zero score, guy!

Post a New Response

(1168945)

view threaded

Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought

Posted by bingbong on Wed Apr 2 23:53:56 2014, in response to Re: North Carolina: Voter fraud under investigation; tighter election security sought, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Apr 2 21:37:43 2014.

fiogf49gjkf0d
You "think" that only because you won't honestly answer the question.

Post a New Response

[1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] >> : Last

 

Page 1 of 13

Next Page >  


[ Return to the Message Index ]