|
|
| Re: Wall Street ''occupiers'' even dumber than first thought (852473) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Wall Street ''occupiers'' even dumber than first thought |
|
|
Posted by SMAZ on Tue Oct 4 21:15:23 2011, in response to Re: Wall Street ''occupiers'' even dumber than first thought, posted by SMAZ on Mon Oct 3 21:19:28 2011. I support seven of them actually.#1,2,4,5,6,10,13. #3 doesn't work. #7 is feel-good nonsense. Current law already does a lot of that and decommissioning nuclear power plants defeats the purpose of #5. Their price tag is unaffordable. #8 is redundant with the Civil Rights Act and other similiar legislation and would only be needed if a reactionary Supreme Court were to start striking them down. #9 is pure lunacy. #11 is what President Hoover's people wanted and is more lunacy. #12 is not feasible. Strong regulation and oversight is needed instead |
|
|
|