|
|
| Re: No, It's the Liberal Secularists (8260) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: No, It's the Liberal Secularists |
|
|
Posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Dec 26 10:25:14 2004, in response to Re: No, It's the Liberal Secularists, posted by BMT Dude on Sun Dec 26 08:51:29 2004. Then what's happenning is that those in the 'Bible Belt' are teaching their young that candy canes ARE a religious symbol (why am I NOT surprised?).I'm not urprised either, but that doesn't mean that it is a "religious" symbol across the board. To me, as a Catholic, a candy cane is "just a piece of candy", and that is what it is to the vast majority of Christian. A candy cane to most Christians is no more religious than a candy cane is to a Jewish person. If I as a fundamentalist Christian decide that a maple tree is some sort of religious symbol, does than mean it's religious to every Christian? Does that mean that maple trees should be cut down from places where it isn't considered religious, just because one group says it's "religious"? |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|