Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: No, It's the Liberal Secularists

Posted by Train Dude on Sun Dec 26 08:52:52 2004, in response to Re: No, It's the Liberal Secularists, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Sun Dec 26 08:23:47 2004.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailOT:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I don't believe that Verbal's question was as out of context as you seem to think. Such advertisements did create problems in bus depots because some objected to the sexual content of the ads while others argued "freedom of speech" of the advertiser. Since the busses are public property, the situations are alalogous.

My question is a bit more basic. The ACLU has, in many cases, spearheaded this Liberal Secularist Jihad against religious symbolism on public property and in public schools. This is the same ACLU that fought on Long Island, Conneticuit and elsewhere for the KKK to hold rallies on public streets. Does the ACLU give added weight to freedom of speech and assembly on public property over freedom of religion on public property?


Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]