|
|
| Re: Karl Rove (4595) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Karl Rove |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sun Nov 28 14:33:42 2004, in response to Re: Karl Rove, posted by Train Dude on Sun Nov 28 08:54:09 2004. I suppose you recently read a picture book that had the words 'neoconservative' and 'deflective' in the first few pages and they stuck, huh?Why the evasion of discussing the Neoconservatives? They're in power now; they've been partially in power since 1993 and fully in power since 2001. And yes, your style of argument is "deflective" since you answer nothing of what I post when you reply, but instead change the subject. Try to keep in mind that while every democratic candidate since Dukakis has tried to compare himself with John F. Kennedy, by todays standards, you'd have to classify him as somewhere to the right of Rush Limbaugh See, you did it again. This thread is about Karl Rove, not Dukakis, JFK or Oxycontin-Man. If I wanted to discuss those people, I would have started a thread about them. As it stands, they (apart from OxyRush) have no effect on the current political landscape. Try not to answer me using non-sequiturs, if you can. If you really want to look at things honestly, Conservatism has migrated from the democrats to the Republicans over the last 30-40 years Then where did the Conservatives go all of a sudden? All I see running the country are Neoconservatives. No Conservative would engage in the fiscal policies that Bush is pursuing—not a single one. And how does this relate specifically to Karl Rove? BTW: What do you suppose Kerry and your neo-liberallies would have done during the Cuban Missle Crisis? Another non-sequitur. I don't own any "neo-liberallies", BTW. Remember, I'm a moderate ex-Republican? |
|
|
|