|
|
| Re: Cohen Free Without Bail On Child-Porn Charges (425024) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Cohen Free Without Bail On Child-Porn Charges |
|
|
Posted by JayZeeBMT on Tue Mar 10 19:29:49 2009, in response to Re: Cohen Free Without Bail On Child-Porn Charges, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Tue Mar 10 19:23:20 2009. Kiddie-porn laws are enforced the way they are for two main reasons:1) Somewhere along the line, a child had to be molested or exploited to produce the images in the first place, and 2) Pedophiles caught producing or possessing kiddie porn are often doing much worse than that. Charging them with kiddie porn gives investigators a tool to discover what else, if anything, the suspect was up to, which cumulatively makes kids safer. I do, however agree with those who say the rights of those accused of possessing kiddie-porn are often trampled, because of the nature of the charges involved. These defendants are presumed guilty until proven innocent (which rarely, if ever happens)... |
|
|
|