|
|
| Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? (318270) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency? |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Wed May 14 21:14:38 2008, in response to Re: Who do YOU Endorse for the Presidency?, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed May 14 21:02:56 2008. From what i read, the companies just seemed to ave brushed off the stirling engine, due to the lack of interest, especially with cheap gas in the 90s. Interesting that the hybrid car of the 90s reported to have failed due to hydrogen leaking, while the original 1980s car did not have a report of suffering from hydrogen leaking.The reason it ultimately failed was due to lack of interest. The fact that it takes so many years to do this simple research is a shame as well. Should all be done in under a year, with proper planning, and execution. Took them 9 years to develop a stirling engine?!?!? There's something wrong there. Maybe little funding, but that really is TOO long. PS, you only need hydrogen because it expands well, i guess, you could use other gasses as well though, that wouldn't leak. It should theoretically be possible with an easily expandable liquid, like mercury i think. The liquid would also produce more force, but expand less. |
|
|
|