|
|
| Re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg (1588751) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Tue Jan 8 10:31:42 2019, in response to Re: Ruth Bader Ginsburg, posted by TRAIN DUDE on Tue Jan 8 10:20:12 2019. I don't like to see anyone powerless because lack of checks and balances leads to government overreach. The goal should not be making anyone's head explode, but making sure things are done within the parameters of the Constitution. I do think that there are names that would put the Democrats between a rock and a hard place if nominated to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg. I just used Judge St. Eve as one example. Former Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval is another. He was formerly a District Court Judge and he has experience with the political process which I think is sorely missing from the Supreme Court. It is easy to spout theory and legalese, but having someone who has actual experience governing is useful when you are looking at interpreting statutes that might have more than one plausible meaning. |
|
|
|