|
|
| Re: George Zimmerman Is WRONG (1278237) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: George Zimmerman Is WRONG |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Fri Apr 3 06:44:01 2015, in response to Re: George Zimmerman Is WRONG, posted by terRAPIN station on Thu Apr 2 14:31:10 2015. Of course I didn't. Because it's a stupid quesiton and you know that. My definition would have no reason to deviate from the range of commonly accepted and understood understandings of the term, which you can easily find online.There are no commonly accepted definitions of that term which include asking for evidence and accepting it when provided. Like the fact that many people here hold an opinion of you that is less than favorable... Name one person who actually matters whose opinion of me is less than favourable. Note that whiny little children like yourself don't count. ... and thus at least somewhat doubt anything remotely odd that you post. At no point have I ever made any false statements. Ergo, by your reasoning my word should be considered absolute. Why would I not ask for evidence, assuming he was being serious? You're the one who stated Spider Pig has sufficiently close to 100% accuracy that there's "no reason to doubt anything" he says. No. Why would I expect that? It's the logical conclusion of your own argument. Spider-Pig made a claim. I asked for evidence. He provided it. I accepted the claim. You shrieked: "PWNED" and claimed this was appropriate. So by your own argument, you should expect that and concede that you were pwned. What in the world are you talking about? Ah, well you're easily confused and not very bright. Why don't you finish second grade first and then come back to this thread? |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|