|
|
| Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules (1169994) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Sat Apr 5 03:34:25 2014, in response to Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Apr 5 03:21:51 2014. I said if a woman is not married and gets pregnant, the man should be informed, and if he decides he does not want to get married and be a father, the woman can then decide to abort or raise the kid on her own and the man has no financial obligation. The man should have some rights too.So then your answers would be that you believe abortion should be legal for all women, and compulsory for none. The right to decide belongs to the woman carrying the pregnancy; if she chooses to abort, she can do so without consulting any other party, but if she chooses to carry the pregnancy to term, she is obligated to consult with the man who induced the pregnancy and offer to fulfill his obligations to the child as well as her own, because men have a right to become parents without facing any inconvenience or having any responsibilities, while women must shoulder exclusive responsibility for the well-being of their children save for those that the father might voluntarily choose to take up entirely of his own free will despite lacking any legal or moral obligations towards his child. Is that more or less accurate? Yes, abortion clearly lowered crime in NYC. By what mechanism? Explain the causal relationship; how did abortion lower the crime rate? They started mass abortion in the 70's and by the 90's they became one of the safest cities and have been ever since. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|