|
|
| Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules (1169292) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Thu Apr 3 21:46:02 2014, in response to Re: US appeals court upholds new Texas abortion rules, posted by LuchAAA on Thu Apr 3 21:20:24 2014. If the child is unplanned, and they are not married, he should have no financial obligation.I agree. If the man had sex entirely by accident, or was one of the extremely rare cases of female-on-male rape, then he should have no financial obligation. However, if he intentionally had sex, then he is responsible for the child that he voluntarily fathered. As stated, the woman has the right to abort or have the kid but the man should have the right to choose not to want anything to do with the kid. The man has every right to choose not to have a kid— I pointed out that he can freely choose to keep it in his pants, but he can also use a condom or get himself sterilised. What he should not be allowed to do is have a child but then disclaim any and all responsibility for it. Women aren't allowed to do that, so why should men? The woman should be on welfare. Except that you believe all welfare should be abolished— or, at minimum, you consistently vote for a party that does, believing their opposition to welfare is a mere "imperfection" not worth withholding your vote over. |
|
|
|