Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) (219561) | |
Home > BusChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(219561) | |
Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by Nabinut on Sat Jan 8 21:28:38 2011 Last Sunday and Monday, I fanned the city and outlying areas. Here are some photos taken Sunday and early Monday. Enjoy!5567 in Downtown Pittsburgh; One of 90 purchased in 2006 5372, a 2005 Gillig Hybrid, one of six in service 3125. a 2005 Neoplan AN460 artic...and the last Neoplan USA bus ever built 1512. one of 60 2003 35 foot Gilligs in service 5640, one of 80 2009 Gilligs in Bright Blue 5721, one of two Hybrids purchased by PAT...the only two buses for 2010 5585 crossing the Sandusky Street Bridge on Route 500: 5644 in Bright Orange 5066, a 1999 Neoplan Low Floor, one of 159 active in the fleet 1934, a 2000 Neoplan Metroliner seen in on rush hour only Route P10: More to Come... |
|
(219571) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Sun Jan 9 01:31:54 2011, in response to Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Sat Jan 8 21:28:38 2011. Cool. |
|
(219637) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Jan 9 22:45:18 2011, in response to Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Sat Jan 8 21:28:38 2011. very nice photos |
|
(219639) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by oldman on Sun Jan 9 23:30:57 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by salaamallah@hotmail.com on Sun Jan 9 22:45:18 2011. nice photos,but too small for this oldtimer |
|
(219641) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by Nabinut on Mon Jan 10 08:35:34 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by oldman on Sun Jan 9 23:30:57 2011. I would make them bigger but a flame war broke out on Subchat on this very request. |
|
(219646) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 10 09:00:48 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Mon Jan 10 08:35:34 2011. Huh? No. Make them 1024 wide. |
|
(219648) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Mon Jan 10 09:01:34 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Mon Jan 10 08:35:34 2011. But seriously, the pics were big enough for me. |
|
(219649) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 10 09:04:20 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Mon Jan 10 08:35:34 2011. Nice photos, but that wasn't the issue at hand if you are thinking of the TMP thread. |
|
(219661) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by Nabinut on Mon Jan 10 10:29:14 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by WMATAGMOAGH on Mon Jan 10 09:04:20 2011. I know. It just began that way. Besides since I post on multiple forums, some request photos no bigger than 800x600. It's just easier for me at least. |
|
(219675) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by oldman on Mon Jan 10 12:04:21 2011, in response to Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Mon Jan 10 10:29:14 2011. 800x600 was the old nom, but now with everyone having hi-speedI figured 768x1024 is about right,I've noticed in Europe most pixs are 800x1200.. so asking for 768x 1024 I don't think is asking too much |
|
(219701) | |
Re: Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I) |
|
Posted by busdude2 on Mon Jan 10 17:27:01 2011, in response to Photos: Port Authority Transit of Pittsburgh (Part I), posted by Nabinut on Sat Jan 8 21:28:38 2011. I guess all the old classics are gone by now. Great pics. |
|