|
|
| Re: CDTA Gillig Pictures (54467) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: CDTA Gillig Pictures |
|
|
Posted by Scrabbleship on Mon Apr 30 22:31:01 2007, in response to Re: CDTA Gillig Pictures, posted by clunker on Mon Apr 30 21:59:53 2007. Because it's a 3-hour hike for much of the readership out here:) That and most of the instigated postings come from one person. As for pictures freezing up, nearly 3 years of little change can do that (the 400 series cutaways and the NX D4500's notwithstanding). I have a CDTA backlog dating back to February waiting to be put online plus some stuff from last year but it gets old--outside the two scheme variants, the few remaining wraps, and the two LED signed LFS's, it gets old to shoot after a while.And to answer QM18's comment on PART and LOOP and such, PART has nothing to photograph while LOOP is stale (no new buses in the last 3 years, no plans for new ones for a few more). Personally, I'd recommend the readership to trek up to Poughkeepsie to see how bad that system is before the low-floor hybrids come in near the new year, I lived it and hated it and it took Moreira one ride to agree. If you can't go down to Prince George's County, Poughkeepsie is a good substitute. In all honesty, I'd love to see more love for some of the systems to the west. There's a dearth of BC Transit and RGRTA pics out there, Canadians cover the NFTA and Railbus covers CENTRO-land. |
|
|
|